Ongoing need to educate clients on value of advice

MetLife life insurance advice

7 July 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

There is an ongoing need for financial advisers to demonstrate their value by educating clients on the benefits of the service, according to a report.

MetLife’s latest report on the value of life insurance found there was still confusion around the value of expert financial advice.

The report found 40% of consumers thought life insurance bought through an adviser was more expensive than a policy they could buy directly online or through a superannuation fund, and one-third of consumers believed the product was better quality.

“This is especially critical given three-in-10 consumers and five-in-10 small to medium enterprises reported they were considering either changing their current adviser, or ceasing to use one completely, citing high premiums, lack of affordability, no ongoing need for insurance or a lack of communication as their top reasons,” the report said.

“Understanding of life insurance also remains low among consumers and SMEs.

“The research found consumers and SMEs were willing to pay an average upfront fee of $1,700 for insurance advice. This is below the average cost to deliver quality financial advice, suggesting there is a critical need to retain commission-for-advice to support affordability and accessibility for Australians.”

It said to counteract this downward trend in the perceived value of financial advice and life insurance, advisers could educate their clients on what they did and how they added value.

“Building trust is also key, so that clients equate the value of the advice with the value they receive from the financial products purchased,” the report said.

The report noted that reducing commissions would push up the direct cost of advice to consumers which would reduce access to quality advice. This would in turn could lead to:

  • Relying on off-the-shelf insurance products;
  • Consumers with lower economics means would lose access to advice;
  • Most customers would not pay upfront for advice if the product was subject to an underwiring process and that could lead them to being denied access to the product;
  • Consumers on claim would lose support of their adviser during a difficult time;
  • Underinsurance rates might increase; and
  • Financial adviser businesses might become unsustainable.

“While different payment models apply around the world, no country that has a strong, voluntary, stand-alone life insurance system has banned commissions. The removal of commissions on life insurance in Australia would be a global first,” the report said.

“For all these reasons, MetLife firmly believes that consumers should have a choice of how to pay for life insurance advice; either fee-for-service or via commission.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 10 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 14 hours ago