Insurer losses ‘self-inflicted’ - APRA

compliance/APRA/insurance-industry/

23 July 2014
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Australian insurers have been guilty of the self-inflicted problems of very aggressive pricing, liberal terms and conditions and underwriting standards but many failed to act until they started incurring losses, according to Australian Prudential Regulation Authority deputy chairman, Ian Laughlin.

Giving evidence before a Parliamentary Committee, Laughlin painted a picture of an insurance industry which failed to heed the regulator's warnings until companies actually started incurring losses as a result of their "self-inflicted" problems.

Asked what had given rise to the losses incurred by the industry, Laughlin said there had been two broad issues - changes in social attitude to mental health had been "a bit of a surprise" and the involvement of lawyers in claims processing had changed dramatically recent times.

"And both of those things have increased claims," he said. "The industry was not necessarily well prepared for either of those, and in some ways that is understandable.

"On the other hand there are some self-inflicted problems — very aggressive pricing, terms and conditions that were also aggressive or very liberal, and underwriting standards that also were very liberal," Laughlin said.

"So those self-inflicted issues have been apparent for some period of time. So to us they were not a surprise; they were something that we had been talking to the industry about for a number of years."

Laughlin said the net result had been losses incurred by insurers and re-insurers and increases in premium rates, particularly with respect to group insurance, of up to 150 per cent — something which was highly undesirable because the costs flowed directly through to members.

He said that while APRA had expressed its significant concerns to the insurers for a number of years, they continued to remain profitable "so there was a reluctance on their part to actually change what they were doing".

"In more recent times they have suffered some losses, and they have been much more receptive to the idea that they needed to change practices," Laughlin said.

 

 

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

3 months ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

4 months ago

Advice firms are increasing their base salaries by as much as $50k to attract talent, particularly seeking advisers with a portable book of clients, but equity offerings ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest financial adviser exam, held in November 2025....

4 days 15 hours ago

Ahead of the 1 January 2026 education deadline for advisers, ASIC has issued its ‘final warning’ to the industry, reporting that more than 2,300 relevant providers could ...

1 week 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo