Banking and insurance would benefit from increased transparency

australian prudential regulation authority

10 December 2010
| By Chris Kennedy |

If banks and insurers could improve transparency, it would yield benefits around regulatory capital requirements, according to an actuarial study conducted by Ernst & Young.

Differences exist in the treatment of products that are economically equivalent and may create regulatory arbitrage opportunities and market distortions, according to the research project, which was chaired by actuary Tony Coleman.

“In some instances, inconsistencies may result in a product provider choosing to manage a product from a part of a group where lower capital standards apply and therefore where a higher return on equity could be achieved,” Coleman said.

Materially different regulatory capital requirements exist in the area of term deposits and term certain annuities, where both products provide guaranteed returns for consumers, but annuities have higher capital requirements because they are provided by life insurers rather than banks.

Higher capital requirements have the effect of lowering the overall return and relative attractiveness of term certain annuities, which needs to be considered in the context of broader public policy, the research found.

At a framework level, provisioning is treated differently between banks and insurers, despite conceptually seeking to achieve a similar purpose.

“The research also sought to recognise that any proposed regulatory reforms focused on greater consistency must also consider the interconnected nature of the financial system and the potential for systemic risks,” Coleman said.

Achieving consistency between sectors is not straightforward, particularly since the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is constrained by history as well as international regulatory developments, the paper noted.

Increased transparency would also benefit both the banking and insurance sectors and would allow a better understanding of the impact of current regulatory reform, highlight areas of potential regulatory arbitrage, enhance decision making within the sectors by increasing awareness of best practice, and improve understanding of the quantum of capital buffers that would assist in risk/reward decisions, according to the research.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS