ASIC sues MLC Life for multiple insurance failures

ASIC MLC Life Sarah Court

19 November 2021
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has commenced civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against MLC Life Insurance for insurance policy and service failures resulting from poor systems and controls.

ASIC claimed that MLC Life's failure to implement appropriate systems and controls resulted in unpaid insurance benefits, premiums being charged without notice and underpaid refunds.

It was alleged MLC Life's conduct led to over $17.5 million in financial harm to over 260,000 customers.

ASIC alleged that from 1999 to November 2020, MLC Life failed to:

  • Pay a life insurance benefit, known as a ‘rehabilitation bonus benefit’, to 297 eligible customers who were undergoing rehabilitation following an insured injury or disability;
  • Update its definition of ‘Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis’ in a timely way, resulting in 12 customers suffering from Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis being denied insurance cover and MLC having to update the definition in over 190,000 insurance policies;
  • Notify over 800 customers that their annual premiums had increased, their premiums were overdue, or that their insurance policies had been cancelled or lapsed; and
  • Fully refund premiums to over 260,000 customers who had cancelled their loan insurance policies or paid out their loans.

ASIC claims that MLC Life breached its obligations as a financial services provider and its duty to act with the utmost good faith when handling claims. ASIC was seeking declarations, pecuniary penalties and other relief from the Federal Court.

ASIC noted poor claims handling and the failure of life insurers to update medical definitions in their insurance policies to accord with current medical practice were both issues considered by the Royal Commission.

MLC Life had advised ASIC that it had remediated customers impacted by the alleged conduct.

Sarah Court, ASIC deputy chair, said consumers should be able to trust insurers to pay their full benefit in times of need and keep them informed about significant changes to their policies.

“This case alleges failures by MLC, over many years, to ensure a reliable delivery of basic and everyday insurance services,” Court said.

“Insurers need to make sure they have adequate systems and controls to manage risk and administer their insurance policies correctly.

“Too often, we are seeing consumers harmed by implementation issues, legacy IT systems and failures resulting from poor governance and culture. ASIC will look to take enforcement action to ensure these systems improve.”

The date for the first case management hearing was yet to be scheduled by the Court.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 2 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 6 hours ago