ASIC may want codes of practice strengthened before granting approval

Banking Royal Commission code of practice insurance regulation ASIC australian securities and investments commission the fold legal enforcement

8 May 2019
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image
expand image

Banking Royal Commissioner Kenneth Hayne’s recommendation that insurance codes of practice are subjected to greater enforceability could well extend to other industry codes, and the Fold Legal has warned that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) would likely require certain code provisions were strengthened before it gave its approval to them.

In addition to the general insurance code of practice, Hayne also recommended that the life and superannuation insurance codes go before ASIC for approval and to determine which provisions would be legally enforceable, suggesting a deadline of June 2021 to do so. While financial services industries could apply to ASIC to approve codes, just two of the 12 codes currently in the sector had been accepted.

And the general insurance code, at least, would likely need significant strengthening before it would be approved by the regulator, according to a blog by the Fold Legal.

Provisions regarding code governance, compliance, monitoring and sanctions would need to be “comprehensively strengthened and addressed” before ASIC would approve any industry code, the blog said, as well as prior stakeholder engagement and adequate provisions for dispute resolution, remedies and sanctions.

Licensees would also need to better track their compliance with the code, especially should aspects become legal, if they wanted to ensure they didn’t breach its provisions.

“It is clear licensees will require much more stringent oversight of code compliance to be alerted where they or their service providers breach the code to prevent systemic failures and to manage their licence conditions,” the Fold Legal’s solicitor director, Charmian Holmes, said.

ASIC had also already previously said that any code it approved must be administered and enforced by an independent body, and also include appropriate sanctions. It had additionally said that it would require consumers have access to internal and external dispute resolution processes for breaches resulting in direct financial loss, and the ability to complain to the independent body about any other code breach.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 3 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 17 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 21 hours ago