AIOFP claims lock out on LIF discussions

life insurance commissions adviser

23 July 2015
| By Jason |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Independently Owned Financial Planners (AIOFP) has continued its campaign to have the details of the tri-party Life Insurance Framework (LIF) proposal released claiming it was locked out of negotiations on the matter.

Responding to statements made by the Financial Planning Association (FPA) yesterday AIOFP executive director Peter Johnston claimed his group was excluded from discussions between the FPA, Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) and Financial Services Council (FSC) on the LIF for wishing to represent advisers ahead of institutions.

"We believe we were locked out of the association negotiations because we would have been there representing the best interests of the advisers not the institutions , something this ‘little exclusive party' apparently did not want."

Johnston claimed the AIOFP had not been ‘late to the party' either and has been monitoring the issue over the past nine months and had met with the Minister (Josh Frydenburg) six months ago to voice its opinion.

Yesterday the FPA responded to prior claims by Johnston that it had not consulted its members by outlining the process it had undertaken with it members, its intended aims and goals for the LIF and questioning why the AIOFP had not been present at industry discussions.

Johnston said there was no dispute around the FPA's process and that its goals of a 60 to 80 per cent upfront commission range, 20 per cent ongoing commission and a two year claw back period accorded closely with the AIOFP's view.

However he questioned why the final LIF proposal was materially different from the FPA member feedback and called for the FPA, AFA and FSC to reveal the full details of their combined LIF proposal.

"Unless the adviser community can get an original ‘unedited' version of the Ministerial submission, we can only assume that the three associations ignored the adviser feedback and placed the interests of the Institutions well ahead the advisers," Johnston said.

He also repeated claims the three groups were under pressure from institutional members "who commercially and politically dominate behind the scenes" or the association were engaged in a ‘good cop-bad cop' routine to improve their standing with members.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

7 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

4 days 12 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 2 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 4 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 days 10 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

2 days 13 hours ago