AFA welcomes exclusion of insurance from IFSA charter

AFA afa chief executive commissions fee-for-service financial services association insurance financial advisers life insurance financial planning association IFSA association of financial advisers chief executive

18 June 2009
| By Liam Egan |

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has welcomed the exclusion of insurance from the Investment and Financial Services Association’s (IFSA's) new superannuation charter.

“Our members will be pleased that IFSA considers life insurance as a different class of product within super, with its own specific requirements, and therefore out of the scope of the charter," AFA chief executive Richard Klipin said.

“Insurance does play a part in super but, unlike super, it is not a mandatory product, and the client has the right to buy or not buy insurance, to not pay the premium or to pay the premium.

“The charter is instead trying to address the mandated nature of super, about which the Australian community does not have a choice, to provide a framework for the industry to go forward in an orderly approach."

Klipin said the IFSA charter’s broader fee-for-service requirement within super would be a non-issue “for some of AFA members, who have been well down that path for some time".

However, he said other AFA members who run a commission model in super are obviously going to have to adjust and transition to accommodate the requirements of the charter.

“In terms of the IFSA charter, which is effective from July 1 next year, IFSA members who offer super products will need to have products that comply with this charter.

“This means that advisers who advise on any of those products of IFSA members won’t have any other choice but to adjust to the charter, because they act as distributors of these products in an advice sense.”

He refused to comment on whether he saw the exclusion of insurance from the charter as a justification for the AFA’s opposition to the Financial Planning Association's (FPA's) plan to phase out commissions.

The AFA had responded to the plan by saying that its members did not want or expect their professional body to tell them how to run their businesses.

The FPA then criticised the AFA’s stance, calling it short-sighted and an attempt to recruit advisers who disagreed with the FPA’s new guidelines.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

1 week 6 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

6 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

3 days 18 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS