AFA says look beyond advisers on churn

AFA afa chief executive financial planning commissions brad fox financial advisers life insurance FSC association of financial advisers financial services council chief executive

5 June 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has called for a full analysis of the underlying issues with respect to churn within the life/risk sector, extending beyond advisers to the role of the major insurance companies.

Responding to the Financial Services Council's (FSC's) announcement that the starting point for the development of a new churn framework would be the position ultimately reached on claw-back before the process was abandoned earlier this year, AFA chief executive Brad Fox said it was not the starting point that mattered but the end point and how it was ultimately achieved.

"Good decisions are made from an accurate assessment of the current situation, and consensus on what is the problem, or problems, that need to be solved," he said. "This will be the focus of the AFA in future discussions with the market place around any changes to the insurance framework."

Fox pointed to the demands of advisers that they not be singled out for attention with respect to churn, and suggestions that the major insurers also needed to accept their responsibilities.

"The ramifications are potentially far-reaching unless an appropriate and equitable outcome is achieved, so it is essential that the process encompasses full analysis of the issues and all the potential effects of implementing changes, whatever they may be," he said.

"This should not be just about the advised channel; it should also encompass direct and group distribution of life insurance," Fox said.

FSC chief executive John Brogden yesterday confirmed that the position reached on the claw-back framework before the issue was shelved earlier this year would be the starting point for the renewed approach to reach a framework for self-regulation.

He said this was the position reached by the FSC's Life Insurance Board Committee, which had taken the view that negotiations around the claw-back framework had been close to achieving a satisfactory outcome and should therefore represent the starting point for the renewed effort.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

5 days 3 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS