AFA gains additional info on life insurance commission

AFA phil anderson quality of advice life insurance

14 November 2022
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) chief executive, Phil Anderson, has clarified proposals under the Quality of Advice (QOA) Review for risk clients.

Recent proposals regarding a client consent requirement for risk clients had been “misinformed” he said.

The proposals had indicated life insurance commissions should be retained and be subject to an obligation for advisers to obtain client consent.

The AFA met with Treasury and QOA reviewer, Michelle Levy, last week following concerns from its members to seek further information on the matter and how it would play out in practice and alongside other QOA recommendations.

This included the form of disclosure of ongoing commission, the implication for the sale of a book of clients and what an adviser needed to do with a consent form.

Writing on LinkedIn, Anderson said:

  • “The consent requirement would be a once off. This is not an annual requirement;
  • Where consent has previously been obtained from the client, it would not be required again. For example, if the upfront and ongoing commissions were previously disclosed in an SoA and the client signed the Authority to Proceed, then this is consent and nothing more would be required;
  • Disclosure of ongoing commissions could be as simple as the commission rate and the dollar amount on the basis of the first year’s premium. This is consistent with current practice, and not an additional obligation. There is no expectation of predicting commissions payable over multiple years; and
  • The adviser needs to keep evidence of client consent. There would be no requirement to provide this to the life insurer.

“The bottom line is that this is nothing like annual renewal and client consent in the super/investment space.

“Clients providing informed consent is not unreasonable. This already happens. In a future world where SoAs are not mandated, we will need to have other ways to ensure disclosure of commissions and confirm consent. That is not difficult to resolve, particularly where it is principles based, rather than prescriptive.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by ANOTHERONE BIT… on Mon, 2022-11-14 09:35

People in our own industry do not even understand the valuable benefit of the commission structure or the required quantum. How in hell will clients be able to understand and confirm. We already give them the amount of commission to be received.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 5 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 4 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

6 days 17 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

5 days 21 hours ago