Actuaries support life insurers remaining under APRA scrutiny

Disability income insurance FSC FPA ASIC APRA Ian Laughlin Actuaries Institute Disability Insurance Taskforce

25 May 2021
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Disability Income Insurance has been the biggest drag on the balance sheets of Australia’s major life insurance companies and the Actuaries Institute is now supporting the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) maintaining its intervention in the area.

Releasing the findings of the Actuaries Institute Disability Insurance Taskforce, the institute has backed the continued regulatory intervention “until such time as the industry demonstrates a sustained improvement in practices and outcomes”.

However, among the recommendations of the taskforce is the use of a reference product by insurers to aid in “balancing innovation and clarity with respect to definitions” and a deferral of the proposed standardisation of insurance policy definitions for at least two years to allow a review of those definitions.

The report also argues that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) should produce examples of application of best interests duty (BID), “including the trade-off of features and price, for IDII (and other life insurance) and include this in RG 175”.

“This should include consideration of customers moving from legacy to new IDII products. Pending ASIC provision of examples in RG 175, the Actuaries Institute, Financial Services Council (FSC) and the Financial Planning Association (FPA)/ Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) should produce examples of application of BID for IDII (and other life insurance),” it said.

The chair of the Actuaries Institute Taskforce, former APRA deputy chair, Ian Laughlin stated simply that the disability income insurance ecosystem was not healthy.

Indeed, the introduction to the final report of the Taskforce suggested that without intervention the market was at risk of failure.

Where financial advice is concerned, the report recommends key amendments to the products ratings process with ratings houses working with licensees to ensure the products achieve what they are meant to achieve in the long-term interests of the customers.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS