Why we should rethink the 60/40 portfolio
The 60/40 portfolio split is too generic to accommodate a number of factors, including the fact not everybody has the same risk profile or is the same age away from retirement.
Speaking at a CFA Societies Australia webinar, Sebastian Page, T.Rowe Price’s head of global multi asset, spoke about his recently released book ‘Beyond Diversification – what every investor needs to know about asset allocation’.
“Given low expected returns going forward and given where rates are increasing longevity risk. The answer to the question ‘how much stocks should I own – should it be 60/40?’ is probably more than you think,” he said.
“If you look at our retirement target date strategies, someone who's 15 years from retirement… we think should hold about 85% of their portfolio in stocks.
“At retirement, the equity weight is still about 55%, which may seem high, but at 55 [years old], you're 10 years away from retirement. When you reach 65, you can expect to live for another 20 plus years.”
Page said the reason why the 60/40 advice was generic advice was because risk was not stable through time.
“On a rolling one-year basis, a 60/40 portfolio can deliver as much as 20% volatility, monthly returns, or as little as 5% depending on the market environment,” Page said.
“That’s the same asset mix… so it can look very aggressive when markets are volatile, or it can look very conservative in quiet times.
“Then you need to take into account the fact that capital markets have changed, interest rates are near an all time low, especially real interest rates, so this means if you want to maintain your expected return you need to take more risk.”
He said the financial industry was evolving to dynamically target risk rather than targeting allocation like the 60/40 split.
AUTHOR
Liam Cormican
Recommended for you
Women are expected to inherit US$124 trillion through the intergenerational wealth transfer, but Capital Group has found they are twice as likely to rely on social media for advice over a financial adviser.
Challenger Investment Management has raised $350 million during the offer period for its new ASX-listed investment structure.
A week after Lonsec downgraded multiple funds from Metrics Credit Partners, rival research house Zenith Investment Partners has opted to retain its ratings for the same funds.
Strong adviser engagement has helped Praemium reach $1 billion in inflows on its Spectrum offering, with a deal with Western Australian wealth firm Euroz Hartleys expected to add as much as $2 billion.
