WHEB: ‘Impact washing’ abusing sustainability industry


George Latham, managing director at WHEB Asset Management, believes the sustainable investment industry is at risk from firms misleading investors with ‘impact washing’ products.
Impact washing was when product providers exaggerated the impact investing claims of their products. These types were ‘abusing’ the sustainable industry, Latham said.
“There is a real risk of impact washing in the industry. There are issues over transparency and governance, there is a need to be completely open about what people are investing in as the more consumers can see then the more open it is. We have to build trust with the outside world.”
He suggested there should be industry marks and standards which would demonstrate the sustainability of a suitable product but that this was only at ‘an early stage’ in Australia as well as a reduction in jargon used by the industry.
WHEB currently ran a Sustainable Impact fund which invests in companies providing sustainability solutions such as water management, cleaner energy and environmental services. Each year, it produced an annual impact report which measured and reported on the extent of positive social and environmental impact created by the fund.
Latham added the situation was worsened by the fact investors were already disengaged with financial products.
“Financial services has a real problem where investors are disengaged with ‘financialised’ products, those products which they see as operating money-for-money. This means very little to the end investor and they don’t understand what is being achieved.
“Impact investing creates a visible connection between society and money.”
The $30m Pengana WHEB Sustainable Impact fund returned 2.7 per cent over one year to 3 June, according to FE Analytics.
Recommended for you
Global X has painted a worrying picture for active ETFs in Australia, with investor adoption proving uneven and the popularity of its low-cost index counterparts only growing stronger.
Australian equity ETFs attracted record inflows of $3.2 billion in 1Q25, while heightened volatility led to a decline in flows for global equity ETFs, according to Vanguard.
The failure of a clinical trial by biotech firm Opthea has caused shares in its backer Regal Partners to decline 52 per cent year-to-date and hit its funds under management, quarterly flows show.
GQG Partners has revealed its quarterly flows for the first three months of 2025 were up 5.8 per cent, after a difficult final quarter of 2024 as a result of institutional redemptions.