van Eyk collapse ends in Macquarie Investment Management penalty

compliance funds management macquarie investment management ASIC

24 August 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The collapse of research house, van Eyk, has had its corollary in the Supreme Court of New South Wales with Macquarie Investment Management Limited (MIML) being penalised for having contravened the Corporations Act.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released a statement in the aftermath of the court decision stating that the court had found that Macquarie Investment Management Ltd contravened the Corporations Act by failing to comply with its duties as a responsible entity of the van Eyk Blueprint International Shares Fund (VBI Fund).

It said the court made declarations of contravention and ordered that MIML pay a civil pecuniary penalty of $400,000, as well as $200,000 for ASIC's legal costs.

The regulator said the decision had resulted from civil penalty proceedings brought by ASIC against MIML in June this year with MIML admitting the contraventions and the parties filing a Statement of Agreed Facts and joint submissions as to the appropriate penalty.

The Court found that MIML failed to comply with its duties as a responsible entity by:

Failing to exercise the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would exercise if they were in MIML's position with respect to three investments totalling $30 million into Cayman Islands-based fund, Artefact Partners Global Opportunities Fund (Artefact), between 6 July and 30 October 2012;

Allowing members to redeem or withdraw units from the VBI Fund when it was illiquid in contravention of the Corporations Act between 15 June 2013 to 9 September 2013; and

Failing to make adequate and timely enquiries in relation to van Eyk's monitoring of the VBI Fund's investment in Artefact between 18 February 2013 and 21 July 2014 (including not making adequate and timely enquiries as to why a full redemption from Artefact had not been paid between 1 January 2014 to 21 July 2014).

Commenting on the outcome, ASIC Commissioner Greg Tanzer, said it represented a significant decision for investors and confirmed the important role of responsible entities in monitoring and supervising funds, even where external managers were appointed.

"ASIC will take action when responsible entities fail to meet those obligations," he said

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

10 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

4 days 15 hours ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 2 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

2 weeks 4 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

3 days 13 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

2 days 16 hours ago