Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

van Eyk collapse ends in Macquarie Investment Management penalty

compliance/funds-management/macquarie-investment-management/ASIC/

24 August 2016
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The collapse of research house, van Eyk, has had its corollary in the Supreme Court of New South Wales with Macquarie Investment Management Limited (MIML) being penalised for having contravened the Corporations Act.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) released a statement in the aftermath of the court decision stating that the court had found that Macquarie Investment Management Ltd contravened the Corporations Act by failing to comply with its duties as a responsible entity of the van Eyk Blueprint International Shares Fund (VBI Fund).

It said the court made declarations of contravention and ordered that MIML pay a civil pecuniary penalty of $400,000, as well as $200,000 for ASIC's legal costs.

The regulator said the decision had resulted from civil penalty proceedings brought by ASIC against MIML in June this year with MIML admitting the contraventions and the parties filing a Statement of Agreed Facts and joint submissions as to the appropriate penalty.

The Court found that MIML failed to comply with its duties as a responsible entity by:

Failing to exercise the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person would exercise if they were in MIML's position with respect to three investments totalling $30 million into Cayman Islands-based fund, Artefact Partners Global Opportunities Fund (Artefact), between 6 July and 30 October 2012;

Allowing members to redeem or withdraw units from the VBI Fund when it was illiquid in contravention of the Corporations Act between 15 June 2013 to 9 September 2013; and

Failing to make adequate and timely enquiries in relation to van Eyk's monitoring of the VBI Fund's investment in Artefact between 18 February 2013 and 21 July 2014 (including not making adequate and timely enquiries as to why a full redemption from Artefact had not been paid between 1 January 2014 to 21 July 2014).

Commenting on the outcome, ASIC Commissioner Greg Tanzer, said it represented a significant decision for investors and confirmed the important role of responsible entities in monitoring and supervising funds, even where external managers were appointed.

"ASIC will take action when responsible entities fail to meet those obligations," he said

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 7 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND