UK shareholders active on remuneration consultation
Shareholders are increasingly engaging with companies on remuneration policies in the United Kingdom, signalling a period of consultation in 2014.
Standard Life Investments reported the 2014 UK Annual General Meeting (AGM) was not an "unqualified success" but did result in a binding shareholder vote on companies' remuneration policies.
"Although shareholders and large companies spent some time in 2013 developing remuneration reporting guidelines, the need for companies to get clarity on shareholders' view meant that consultation was their preferred method of preparing for AGMs," the report said.
But not all companies were able to get unanimous support from their shareholders for their remuneration policies.
Some remain unhappy at the use of wide discretionary powers for remuneration committees, secrecy over performance measurement targets, and unnecessarily generous rewards for threshold performance.
While this is a good outcome, the report noted shareholder engagement could plummet in the interim as AGMs happen only once in three years.
"We hope that this is not the case and, instead, it becomes an opportunity to focus on other aspects of shareholder concern such as values and business practices, audit quality and succession planning," the report said.
A similar trend is evident in Australia, where shareholder engagement exists at a much higher level, an AMP.NATSEM report found.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
Asset managers may be urged to diversify their product ranges, but investment executives have warned any M&A deal should avoid simply filling gaps and instead consider long-term value creation.
Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equity firm.
Fund managers are entering 2025 with the most bullish sentiment since August 2021 and record high allocations to US equities, thanks to the incoming Trump administration.
An independent expert has ruled the Perpetual deal with KKR is no longer in the best interest of shareholders in light of the increased tax liabilities.
