Traditional ETFs better suited to academia
Traditional exchange traded funds (ETF) based on market capitalisation indices are a poor investment model and are better suited for use as academic tools or economic indicators than as the basis for investments, according to Market Vectors Australia.
A whitepaper released by the group also states that traditional indices are not suitable for ETFs because many of the stocks in the index are not liquid and indices are often dominated by large stocks.
Market Vectors indicated this was an area of concern in the Australian market, where the top 10 stocks make up more than 50 per cent of top 200 securities by market capitalisation.
The group stated that equal weight indices were more diversified than market capitalisation indices and outperformed traditional ETFs over the long term, citing a CSIRO-Monash Superannuation Research Cluster research paper published in 2013.
According to Market Vectors, the research paper found that an equal weight index delivered the best long-term performance compared to fundamental indices and market capitalisation indices in the US.
Market Vectors stated that the research found that $1 invested in an equal weight index in 1962 would have grown to $100.86 in 2009, while a $1 investment in a market-cap weighted index would have returned $59.04 for the same period.
Recommended for you
Fund managers may be operating in a squeezed environment, but a salary guide shows they are willing to pay up for specialist talent to diversify their fund range.
Reach Alternative Investments has entered into a strategic partnership with Russell Investments to bolster its wholesale private markets offering for financial advisers and investors.
Boutique investment consulting and research house Genium Investment Partners has announced a senior appointment to drive further growth in its research ratings business.
Nuveen has appointed a global head of estate, a successor to Chris McGibbon who steps down after almost 25 years.
