Traditional ETFs better suited to academia
Traditional exchange traded funds (ETF) based on market capitalisation indices are a poor investment model and are better suited for use as academic tools or economic indicators than as the basis for investments, according to Market Vectors Australia.
A whitepaper released by the group also states that traditional indices are not suitable for ETFs because many of the stocks in the index are not liquid and indices are often dominated by large stocks.
Market Vectors indicated this was an area of concern in the Australian market, where the top 10 stocks make up more than 50 per cent of top 200 securities by market capitalisation.
The group stated that equal weight indices were more diversified than market capitalisation indices and outperformed traditional ETFs over the long term, citing a CSIRO-Monash Superannuation Research Cluster research paper published in 2013.
According to Market Vectors, the research paper found that an equal weight index delivered the best long-term performance compared to fundamental indices and market capitalisation indices in the US.
Market Vectors stated that the research found that $1 invested in an equal weight index in 1962 would have grown to $100.86 in 2009, while a $1 investment in a market-cap weighted index would have returned $59.04 for the same period.
Recommended for you
Regal Partners has passed $20 billion in funds under management, helped by $723 million in net inflows during the last three months.
Global investment manager Fidante has formed a strategic partnership with a London-based asset manager to secure exclusive distribution rights across the APAC region.
Blackwattle Investment Partners has hired a management trio from First Sentier Investors – who departed amid the closure of four investment teams last year – to run its first equity income offering.
Private markets manager Fortitude Investment Partners has launched an evergreen small-cap private equity fund.
