Too many managers spoil the returns: van Eyk
Too many active managers can dilute the benefits of risk through over-diversification, according to van Eyk chief executive Mark Thomas.
Thomas said van Eyk research showed active managers bet mostly on movements in the market, and although investors paid higher fees for managed funds, portfolios often held little stock-specific or active risk.
Combining active managers in a portfolio can water down that small amount of risk even further, according to van Eyk.
From three randomly selected active fund managers in a single portfolio, only two stockholdings varied more than 2 per cent from the benchmark while the rest were less than 2 per cent of their market weight, according to the research.
"You need to dig down deep into the detail when mixing these sorts of investments in order to get the degree of risk you intended," Thomas said.
Thomas said it was the right time for investors to be taking on more risk due to relatively attractive share valuations, and ongoing market volatility driven by the euro crisis and other economic strains that give active managers the opportunity to exploit market mispricing.
Recommended for you
Moody’s has painted an optimistic picture for alternative asset managers in the year ahead, with lower interest rates and deregulation likely to prove supportive for their growth.
Platinum Asset Management has released its latest funds under management, with outflows notably improving from the $841 million lost in November.
Bennelong Funds Management chief executive, John Burke, has shared the firm’s priorities for 2025 including offering its responsible entity service to third parties.
With numerous private equity firms taking an interest in Australia, Money Management explores their backgrounds and the leading players who could take a stake.
