Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

A tale of four builders

property-market/ASX/australian-securities-exchange/

5 May 2020
| By Laura Dew |
image
image image
expand image

There has been a sharp divergence in the fortunes of the four major construction firms with two seeing positive returns and two losing more than 40% over the same period. 

CSR, Boral, James Hardie and Adelaide Brighton all reported losses year to date, ranging from 21% for CSR to 36% for Boral.  

Unlike many sectors, construction was able to weather the COVID-19 storm as the majority of sites have been allowed to remain open as ‘essential work’. But, on a seasonally-adjusted basis, building approvals fell 4% in March and the value of total buildings approved fell by 6.5%.  

However, the bigger divergence was seen in one-year performance. Over one year to 1 May, 2020, James Hardie reported returns of 8% while CSR reported returns of 7%.  

But for Adelaide Brighton and Boral, both firms reported losses of more than 40% with Adelaide Brighton losing 40% and Boral losing 41.7%.  

Share price performance of CSR, James Hardie, Boral and Adelaide Brighton over one year to 1 May 2020 

 

Boral was heavily skewed towards to the Australian property market and COVID-19 was impacting demand for its building materials. It was also subject to a class action for its US business. In an update to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), the firm said demand was “substantially declining”. 

“Demand is declining in most markets and is expected to continue to decline, particularly in residential construction markets where the pipeline of work is substantially reducing in all geographies,” it said. 

“As a result, where we have sufficient inventory levels to supply customers, production curtailments are planned and are taking place, including shift reductions and temporary plant closures.” 

Adelaide Brighton, which manufactures cement, reported full-year 2019 net profits were $47 million, down from $185 million for the same period a year previously. It had embarked on a cost-cutting program, it said, but still expected to see ‘cost headwinds’ in 2020. As a result, it withdrew its earning guidance for 2020.  

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND