Stock quality more important than investment style

DNR Capital growth v value growth Value jamie nicol

1 December 2020
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

Investors should focus instead on quality and an intersection of growth and value to get ‘quality at a reasonable price’, according to DNR Capital.

The firm’s recent study on ‘Qualifying Value and Growth’ showed that the history of the stock market saw periods where both styles – growth and value –  had been in and out of favour, even though growth stocks outperformed value counterparts to unprecedented levels since the Global Financial Crisis (GFC).

Therefore, DNR said, it was important in assessing portfolio exposure to understand different categories of both value and growth investing, with different opportunities and risk profiles.

“In informing DNR Capital’s investment strategy, this debate is a constructive lens through which to assess the broader market, but quality remains the core of our philosophy. We explore how a balanced approach to selecting the highest quality stocks delivers sustainable performance, without anchoring portfolios to a blind commitment to one style,” DNR Capital’s chief investment officer, Jamie Nicol, said.

The key takeaways from a study with UBS Quant and Strategy, which explored the quality measures, were:

  1. The cheapest quintile of value stock actually underperformed the market significantly;
  2. The growth factor produced highly inconsistent results with the second lowest and second highest growth baskets outperforming only;
  3. Quality provided more consistent outcomes with the lowest quality basket significantly underperforming, while the highest and second highest quality baskets outperformed; and
  4. The largest underperformance across the entire study was from lowest quality basket.

“Exceptionally high-quality stocks are uncommon, require detailed and rigorous research to validate, and at times fall into either growth and/or value classifications. Economic cycles and the machinations of the market means both value and growth styles have their time in the sun,” Nicol said.

“We conclude that in this current environment of extremes, it is prudent to fall back on our process and philosophy of balance, without an overarching anchor to value or growth, but always with a strong bias towards quality.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS