Sterling collapse occurred due to policy not regulation

australian securities and investments commission

16 December 2021
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

While the corporate regulator has an oversight role and some may conclude that it should be able to prevent things like the Sterling collapse, it is a policy failure issue rather than regulatory failure, according to Tony D’Aloisio.

The former Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) chair and current Perpetual chair, said during a parliamentary hearing about the Sterling Income Trust that the problems that arose from the collapse was an issue of the policy that allowed markets to operate freely with minimum intervention.

“The problem with registered managed investment schemes and ASIC being the same with its oversight role, it leads to a conclusion that ASIC should be able to prevent these things. I think the committee should examine that issue very carefully,” he said.

“It's a serious policy issue that we have, and we had it in 2010. And more of it's going to occur, as interest rates are low and retail investors are searching for income for their retirement, and having money in term deposits is not an option.

“So, they're going to look at these products. This is, you know, a real issue. And I'm grateful that you're looking at it.”

D’Aloisio said the ASIC legislation worked in allowing free markets to come in with products offered to groups like mums and dads but there were protection options.

“You can ban certain products because they’re to risky and involve the family home and you just ban them. But that’s very hard for a regulator and government policy to do that in the free markets theory we’ve been operating in,” he said.

“Then there’s allowing it with really strong regulatory oversight. The problem with strong regulatory oversight is that it tends to come in after something goes wrong. It is very difficult for regulators to look at all the products that are in the market and try to anticipate where they could go wrong. They don't have the resources and the policies are not set up there, so that that doesn't work.”

D’Aloisio suggested what could be done was to improve the advice given to people prior to making the investment.

“You put the pressure on getting that advice and I've called it ‘risk discovery advice’. I think that puts you in a much, much better position as a retiree but it does not eliminate it [the risk] completely,” he said.

“A lot of those retirees, I think if they'd been advised about the risks of a long-term investment in Sterling was to meet their rent over a considerable number of years, it's unlikely with proper advice that they would have invested in it.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 5 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 3 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

6 days 8 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

5 days 12 hours ago