Should investors remove the divide between value and growth?

CFA Societies Oaktree Capital Management

14 October 2021
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image
expand image

Ben Graham and Warren Buffett, two pioneers of modern investing, did not likely intend there to be such a sharp line between value and growth investing, according to Oaktree Capital Management.

Speaking at the CFA Societies Australian Investment Conference, Howard Marks, Oaktree Capital Management co-chair, said investors should strive for open mindedness and avoid conforming to one form of investing over the other.

This was to not advocate growth over value, but to explore the mindset that would prove most valuable for value investors over the coming decades, regardless of what the market would do in the years just ahead.

“It's important that all investors recognise that the potential range of outcomes for many of these companies is very wide,” Marks said.

“And that there are considerations with enormous implications for the ultimate value of many companies that do not show up in today’s readily available quantitative data.”

He said determining the appropriateness of the market price of an asset requires deep micro-understanding – making it impossible to “opine on the valuation of a rapidly growing company from 30,000 feet or by applying traditional value parameters to superficial projections”.

Marks said the key to investing was to understand how an equity’s current market price related to the company’s broadly defined intrinsic value, including its prospects.

“Open mindedness is something we strive for, that there should not be such a big distinction between value investing and growth investing,” he said.

According to Marks, value investing did not have to be about low valuation metrics.

“The fact that a security carries a high P/E [profits to earnings] ratio doesn't mean it's overpriced,” Marks said.

“The fact that another has a low P/E ratio doesn't mean it's a bargain. The range of potential value is extreme and you have to know something about [an equity] before you can make judgments about over and under-pricing.”

Conversely, he said companies with high P/E ratios which grow rapidly off intangibles such as technology could still be analysed through value processes.

“The fact that a company is expected to grow rapidly doesn't mean it's unpredictable. The fact that another has a history of steady growth doesn't mean it can’t run into trouble,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS