Scientific Beta identifies risks of changes to factor indices
A new study from Scientific Beta and Scientific Analytics has identified the risks of making changes to factor indices.
The new paper examined the lack of consistency in factor indices and what risks of the index changes meant, with possible implications being inconsistent factor definitions, factor selection and portfolio construction principles.
Another danger arising from those inconsistencies was the common methodological changes in the industry, which could potentially lead to striking differences in the performance of multi-factor indices, the paper said.
Additionally, the other problems identified by the study included inconsistencies across time with data-mining risks and therefore the absence of any reliability of the performance presented.
According to Scientific Beta’s chief executive, Noel Amenc, index providers should put stringent requirements on index changes to remain consistent with their investment principles.
“Indeed, if the urge to 'innovate' means deviating from investment principles that were not really justified by serious research and corresponded more to approaches driven by in-sample back-testing, there is a risk that index investors will be disappointed with results,” he said.
“Maintaining investment discipline by adhering to a set of long-term principles may be the best safeguard against negative surprises with factor indices.”
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Active ETFs have hit a “critical inflection point” with a particular growth observed in fixed income products, and JPMAM’s global head of ETFs expects the fixed income ETFs to reach US$6 trillion within the next five years.
Global X ETFs has expanded its national presence by opening its first office in Western Australia, alongside announcing three new appointments.
State Street has shared several ETF predictions for how ETFs could grow in 2025 and beyond, including a focus on artificial intelligence and alternative investments.
The democratisation of alternatives funds was a key reason for Barings to consider entering the Australian wealth management market, its Australian wealth distribution head has stated.
