Promoter of non-existent fund banned for four years
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) banned the promoter of a non-existent managed fund from providing financial services after finding he had engaged in in misleading and deceptive conduct.
ASIC banned Paul Duncan, of Carrara, Queensland - who was the sole director of Active Capital Managers Pty Ltd (ACM) from February 2011- for a period of four years.
The ban came about after ASIC found false or misleading representations on ACM's website from around August 2013 onwards relating to the Exalt Managed Futures Fund.
Those representations, which ASIC considered as false and misleading were likely to give the impression that the fund existed and was offered by Exalt Global Fund Limited, a separate firm which does hold an Australian Financial Services Licensee.
ASIC was also concerned that it appeared the fund was fully regulated and trading at low risk whilst generating high returns when in fact it had never existed, nor did it operate under any financial services licence, and it was not regulated or trading when the representations were made
ASIC Commissioner Greg Tanzer said the law required that financial products be offered by licensed businesses and that the promotion and advertising of financial products did not mislead or deceive investors
Duncan has the right to appeal to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal for a review of ASIC's decision.
Recommended for you
Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equity firm.
Asset managers may be urged to diversify their product ranges, but investment executives have warned any M&A deal should avoid simply filling gaps and instead consider long-term value creation.
Fund managers are entering 2025 with the most bullish sentiment since August 2021 and record high allocations to US equities, thanks to the incoming Trump administration.
An independent expert has ruled the Perpetual deal with KKR is no longer in the best interest of shareholders in light of the increased tax liabilities.