Portfolios should have the best of both worlds
Both active and passive management investment strategies have their place in portfolios depending on market cycles, asset classes and sectors of the share market, says new research from Perennial Value Management (Perennial Value).
Perennial presented its research at the Financial Planning Association’s National Roadshow, revealing that while active managers have outperformed in periods where market conditions were more favourable, the average Australian manager has done it tough relative to the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Accumulation index over the last ten years.
Perennial Value portfolio manager, Stephen Bruce, said active managers were shown to outperform the most in periods of higher stock dispersion and lower stock correlation.
He warned investors that while we have been in “a largely macro-driven market” post the global financial crisis (GFC), the new cycle would see synchronised global growth, quantitative tightening and increased volatility, and would perhaps be more suited to passive management.
“Our research shows that active managers also tend to outperform in sectors which have information asymmetry and poor stock analyst coverage, for example the small and micro-cap sectors of the ASX.”
Bruce cautioned that investors should be wary of relying only on passive investing, and that overweighting a portfolio with purely passive products could mean investors would miss out on significant alpha in certain market conditions.
“It can also leave investors exposed to greater sequencing risk, as the research also shows that active managers tend to perform better in down markets.”
Perennial Value’s head of retail, Cesar Farfan, said investors stood to benefit from having the best of both worlds in a portfolio, and there is no “one size fits all” in the active versus passive debate.
“Longer-term market cycles have favoured both active and passive at different points, but given we are now heading into a higher-growth, rising interest rate and more volatile environment, it could be time for investors and advisers to think about re-weighting portfolios and adding more active elements,” said Farfan.
“That said, the development of passive products has had a lot of positive effects on the funds management market in general, with active managers responding to investor demand by shifting to listed structures, lower fees and an increased focus on absolute returns.”
AUTHOR
Anastasia Santoreneos
Recommended for you
Lonsec and SQM Research have highlighted manager selection as a crucial risk for financial advisers when it comes to private market investments, particularly due to the clear performance dispersion.
Macquarie Asset Management has indicated its desire to commit the fast-growing wealth business in Australia by divesting part of its public investment business to Japanese investment bank Nomura.
Australia’s “sophisticated” financial services industry is a magnet for offshore fund managers, according to a global firm.
The latest Morningstar asset manager survey believes ETF providers are likely to retain the market share they have gained from active managers.
