Portfolios should have the best of both worlds
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf433/bf43338cba3a609113fef9e72b230f2dddd1ec58" alt="Stick with active management image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf433/bf43338cba3a609113fef9e72b230f2dddd1ec58" alt="Stick with active management image"
Both active and passive management investment strategies have their place in portfolios depending on market cycles, asset classes and sectors of the share market, says new research from Perennial Value Management (Perennial Value).
Perennial presented its research at the Financial Planning Association’s National Roadshow, revealing that while active managers have outperformed in periods where market conditions were more favourable, the average Australian manager has done it tough relative to the S&P/ASX All Ordinaries Accumulation index over the last ten years.
Perennial Value portfolio manager, Stephen Bruce, said active managers were shown to outperform the most in periods of higher stock dispersion and lower stock correlation.
He warned investors that while we have been in “a largely macro-driven market” post the global financial crisis (GFC), the new cycle would see synchronised global growth, quantitative tightening and increased volatility, and would perhaps be more suited to passive management.
“Our research shows that active managers also tend to outperform in sectors which have information asymmetry and poor stock analyst coverage, for example the small and micro-cap sectors of the ASX.”
Bruce cautioned that investors should be wary of relying only on passive investing, and that overweighting a portfolio with purely passive products could mean investors would miss out on significant alpha in certain market conditions.
“It can also leave investors exposed to greater sequencing risk, as the research also shows that active managers tend to perform better in down markets.”
Perennial Value’s head of retail, Cesar Farfan, said investors stood to benefit from having the best of both worlds in a portfolio, and there is no “one size fits all” in the active versus passive debate.
“Longer-term market cycles have favoured both active and passive at different points, but given we are now heading into a higher-growth, rising interest rate and more volatile environment, it could be time for investors and advisers to think about re-weighting portfolios and adding more active elements,” said Farfan.
“That said, the development of passive products has had a lot of positive effects on the funds management market in general, with active managers responding to investor demand by shifting to listed structures, lower fees and an increased focus on absolute returns.”
Recommended for you
Selfwealth has provided an update on the status of its scheme implementation deed with Bell Financial Group as well as whether rival bidder Svava remains in the picture.
Magellan Financial Group has reported its first half FY25 results while appointing a new chief financial officer and promoting Sophia Rahmani to chief executive.
Schroders Australia has launched two active ETFs and plans to further expand its listed range over the year ahead.
Platform Netwealth has reported its financial results for the first half of FY25, reporting an 80 per cent increase in net flows, with its CEO viewing a “huge opportunity” from private assets.