Planners fail to understand alternative investments

financial planning platforms funds management planners self-managed super funds financial planners cent asset class australian market

14 June 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Financial planners have not been interested in alternative investments since they do not pay commissions - but have disguised this by claiming alternative investments do not offer liquidity within a client portfolio. 

However, the need to have a portfolio that is totally liquid “is a widespread industry furphy that allows planners to churn product”, according to BlueSky Alternative Investments managing director Mark Sowerby. 

Sowerby readily admits that alternative investments do not offer the daily liquidity demanded by many planners and platforms, but said many planners did not understand the investments. He added planners were not aligning the needs of clients with the provision of advice and application of products, but said they cannot claim ignorance. 

“When alternatives first appeared about 15 years ago they could be excused for not knowing about them, but not anymore. The information is out there and has been for some time,” Sowerby said. 

The Australian market for alternative investments was unsophisticated, according to Sowerby, with institutions investing about 15 per cent of portfolios into the asset class while self-managed super funds invested about 1 per cent. 

“Australia has become an insular and conservative market in recent years, with a reluctance to pay for expertise and a willingness to overlook returns to focus solely on investment fees,” Sowerby said. 

“Fee-for-service will change this attitude, and that has been a great structural change which for alternative investment managers has been a slow burn.” 

The shift to fee-for-service and the need to find other sources of investment return would boost the stocks of alternative investments, according to Sowerby, who points to the Future Fund as a template. 

“Alternative investments will occupy 20 to 30 per cent of portfolios in the next 10 to 15 years, with a number of major product providers already looking at how to offer products and considering which managers to use,” he said. 

“They also offer a point of differentiation for planners who often compete on price, and when you look at alternatives’ performance, as evidenced in the Future Fund, you can see they are useful, but you do have to do the work to understand and advise on them. 

“However, planners who are interested in alternative investments cannot see this as a 'part time’ job. They need to be either in or out. A 20 per cent allocation will require 50 per cent of their time in coming to terms with how they work and the benefits for clients, but they will generate 50 per cent of returns,” Sowerby said. 

“The time spent on managing alternative investments will decrease as the investments are long-term - but the pay-off is a multi-year event.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

5 days 3 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS