PFA warns that regulation could hurt retail investors

treasury/PFA/Unlisted-property/regulation/retail-investment/funds-management/

3 April 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image image
expand image

The Treasury’s proposal to increase regulation for unlisted property products could lead to fewer products being available to retail investors, the Property Funds Association (PFA) has warned.

The Association, which is the peak industry body for the $125 billion Australian unlisted wholesale and retail funds sector, said that the legislation, which could be enacted this year, would damage both retail investors and the sector as a whole.

“Treasury’s proposed product design and distribution obligations combined with new product intervention powers would lead to consolidation among retail providers of unlisted property funds, and fewer choices for retail investors.”

Increased compliance, uncertainty and costs could make it harder for boutique and mid-market fund providers, potentially leading to more deciding to only sell wholesale.

The PFA pointed to the proposed need for product issuers to identify the ‘appropriate target market’ for their products as an example of a potential stumbling block for product providers, saying that it shifted more risk to them.

“Legislating this requirement places more risk on the issuer and arguably shifts responsibility from the financial adviser to the product issuer,” PFA chief executive, Paul Healy, said.

“Unlisted property funds will need to spend more on compliance, legal advice, and possibly consumer testing to satisfy these requirements. Those funds which do go ahead will be under pressure to pass these increased compliance costs on to investors.”

Healy said that while investors must be protected, this must not be at the cost of product innovation, much of which comes via boutique providers. This was particularly important in the current period of demand from retail investors for unlisted property vehicles.

He also believed that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) already had appropriate tools to protect unlisted property investors.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 2 weeks ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

1 week ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

3 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay....

1 week 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5