The perils of factor investing in Australian equities

ASX-200/VanEck/australian-equities/

25 July 2022
| By Liam Cormican |
image
image image
expand image

With the Australian share market dominated by banking and resources heavyweights, Australian investors need to think beyond active and market-cap strategies in Australian equities, according to VanEck.

While factor investing, a popular method used by active managers and smart beta approaches, had been an effective way to achieve excess returns over the long term in global equities, the same strategies used in Australia had not achieved outperformance.

Arian Neiron, VanEck's chief executive and managing director - Asia Pacific, said: “While single factor strategies work in global markets, in Australia they don’t work so well as the universe of companies is too small, too concentrated and there is a lack of variability over time.

“A concentrated market means that the lion’s share of performance is attributed to mega caps, limiting stock diversification and performance attribution to companies smaller than these mega-caps. BHP alone represents 11% of the ASX 200, which skews the performance of the overall share market.”

Stock and sector concentration and the limited size of the Australian equities universe were the reasons for factors such as ‘quality’, ‘value’ and ‘growth’ factors had not achieved outperformance in Australia, according to the VanEck whitepaper.

“The ASX 200 is also concentrated in sectors; financials and resource companies account for more than 50% of ASX 200 exposure,” Neiron said.

“This small size and concentration restricts the operation of factors. Australia accounts for less than 2% of developed markets performance benchmark MSCI World. MSCI World covers approximately 1500 holdings compared to 200 holdings in the ASX 200.”

Neiron said an alternative to factor investing in Australia was equal weighting.

“Equally-weighted portfolios have historically outperformed their market capitalisation counterparts over the long term due to the size bias which single factor strategies fail to harness.

“Equal weighting, as the names suggests, is a proportional measure that gives the same importance to each stock in a portfolio, regardless of a company’s size.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

5 months 1 week ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

5 months 2 weeks ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

7 months 2 weeks ago

The RBA has handed down its much-anticipated rate decision, following widespread expectations of a close call....

5 days 3 hours ago

The FSCP has issued a written direction to an adviser who charged clients “extraordinary fees” for inappropriate and conflicted advice, as well as encouraged them to swit...

2 weeks 6 days ago

ASIC has confirmed the industry funding levy for the 2024–25 financial year, and how much licensees can expect to pay....

1 week 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5