National fund managers feel sting

morningstar/chairman/chief-executive/

4 October 2000
| By Kate Kachor |

The National’s funds management arms have felt the analytical sting of Morning-star with the ratings of County Investment Management being dropped to two stars and the National branded funds management being temporarily suspended.

The National’s funds management arms have felt the analytical sting of Morning-star with the ratings of County Investment Management being dropped to two stars and the National branded funds management being temporarily suspended.

County’s rating had been suspended and has been reduced to the two star rating, or poor standing, due to changes at the group.

Morningstar chief executive Graham Rich says Morningstar found that many of County’s funds were in a state of flux and turmoil following the announcement of a sale of the group by National two months ago.

“Unfortunately for County, there were three issues that hindered its monthly re-evaluation. The change within the NAB funds generally affected County, the over-exposure to the Loy Yang Indexed Annuity, and its sale,” Rich says.

“All this information moved County to a two star rating with many of its funds downgraded to a one star rating.”

County chairman Charles Macek says the downgrading of the group has been a bitter disappointment, and a result he does not agree with at all.

Macek says it is hard to believe the group’s ratings has decreased to its lower rat-ings, after its June figures found 19 of the company’s products were rated as four and five stars.

Morningstar says further changes in NAB and its adjoining groups including NAM didn’t give a stable enough indication of the group’s star rating, causing a tempo-rarily suspension of the group’s rating.

“The ratings normally take three to four weeks. We are sufficiently satisfied with the extent of flux within the NAB group and a downgrade is highly likely,” he says.

Unlike other research groups, Rich says Morningstar does not place its evaluating funds on hold or cease the recommendation of the pending funds. He says labelling a fund as pending a rating enables more time for information to be gathered and a more current and accurate evaluation to be given.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

2 months 1 week ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

4 months 1 week ago

A Sydney financial adviser has been permanently banned from providing any financial services, with the regulator deriding his “lack of integrity, trustworthiness and prof...

3 weeks 3 days ago

Minister for Financial Services, Stephen Jones, has provided further information about the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes (DBFO) reforms....

2 weeks 1 day ago

One licensee has lost 27 advisers in the past week, now sitting at zero, according to the latest Wealth Data figures....

3 weeks 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS