Market exposure important in smart beta strategies

funds management Smart beta ERI Scientific Beta Noel Amenc

16 May 2018
| By Oksana Patron |
image
image
expand image

Smart beta indices platform provider, ERI Scientific Beta, has said that more attention should be paid to market exposure when conducting analyses of smart beta strategies.

The firm’s research “Mind the Gap: On the importance of understanding and controlling market risk in smart beta strategies” said that many new multi-factor investment methodologies ignored exposure to the market factor which was often the most important factor for a strategy.

The study also found that over the long term, adjusting the market beta of a multi-factor strategy with that of a cap-weighted index contributed to an annual gain in performance of more than one per cent.

ERI Scientific Beta’s chief executive, Noel Amenc explained that its flagship offering, the Multi-Beta Multi-Strategy Six-Factor High Factor Intensity Equal Weight, offered two versions: with and without market beta control.

“This distinction, with and without market beta adjustment (MBA), corresponds to a very straightforward approach since these two versions have the same Sharpe ratio over the long term,” he said.

“The version without the MBA risk control option has a defensive beta bias and as such has lower volatility than that of the market, and given its low market beta bias, does not allow one to benefit from all the returns of the markets.

“The MBA version, whether it is implemented in the form of overlay or leveraged, logically has volatility that is quite similar to that of the market, since the strategy is 100 per cent exposed to the volatility of the market, and therefore constructs its improvement in the Sharpe ratio over the long term on the excess return procured by factor premia.”

Noel stressed, that according to the research findings, that ultimately the version without MBA was probably the version which corresponded best to an absolute risk budgeting, and therefore cap-weighted benchmark substitution, approach while the second option corresponded best to a relative risk budgeting such as conditional relative performance, tracking error approach.

Therefore, the second version as such should be recommended for investors concerned about replacing an active manager, he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 5 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 3 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

6 days 6 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

5 days 10 hours ago