Kapstream ‘confused’ by US trade war threats

Kapstream trade war Steve Goldman Raymond Lee

19 February 2020
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

The potential and unknown impact of a ‘full-blown trade war’ in the US remains a blot on the horizon for the Kapstream Capital Absolute Return Income fund.

In a monthly update, the firm said a trade war could reduce US growth by up to 0.5% annually and that US inflation would be contained around 2% for the next few years.

Managed by Steve Goldman, Raymond Lee and Dan Siluk, the fund had 11% allocated to North America, its joint second-highest weighting with Asia ex Japan.

They said they believed the US trade war with China would have far more of a political impact than an economic one and highlighted there was ‘little political incentive’ for a solution to be reached between the two countries.

“We remain confused by market reactions to random Trump trade war tweets. We’re general believers in lower US rates as the trade war will remain unresolved, despite the Phase 1 deal. However, we view the trade war as a political game rather than economic story and don’t place a high conviction/information ratio on lower rates/longer duration.”

The ‘Phase 1’ deal was reached in December, 2019 and saw China agree to buy US$200 billion of products and services from the US over the next two years. In exchange, the US agreed to reduce tariffs on $120 billion of Chinese products from 15% to 7.5%.

Performance of S&P 500 and Shanghai Composite index over one year to 31 January, 2020.

“We see economic policy gridlock given split Congress. Policy progress is unlikely until the November elections and prospects for major infrastructure spending, or tax and healthcare policy adjustments limited. Trade policy is also likely to remain unchanged with continuing trade war rhetoric, albeit with little political incentive for a solution, leading to a long, drawn-out saga with no near-term resolution.”

Meanwhile, the fund was still avoiding the UK, a position it had taken for more than three years, given the ongoing uncertainty caused by Brexit and the UK’s political situation.

“We have mainly avoided UK positions since the 2016 Brexit vote, having little insight into the political decisions that will ultimately drive economic performance. We had been sceptical over the leadership’s ability to deliver a workable Brexit solution, despite the 31 January withdrawal,” the managers said.

The Kapstream Absolute Return Income fund returned 3.7% over one year to 31 January, 2020, according to FE Analytics, versus returns of 8.2% by the ACS Absolute Return sector.

Performance of Kapstream Absolute Return Income fund and ACS Absolute Return sector over one year to 31 January, 2020

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

3 weeks 4 days ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 month ago

Insignia Financial has confirmed it is considering a preliminary non-binding proposal received from a US private equity giant to acquire the firm. ...

1 week 2 days ago

Six of the seven listed financial advice licensees have reported positive share price growth in 2024, with AMP and Insignia successfully reversing earlier losses. ...

5 days 8 hours ago

Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equi...

4 days 12 hours ago