Investors should look to Asia for diversification
Investors can find better growth and diversification opportunities in Asia ex-Japan, than they can in Australia, according to AMP Capital.
Head of Asian equities, Patrick Ho, said some of the 10 countries in the Asia ex-Japan sector were predicting strong gross domestic product (GDP) growth. For example, China expected six per cent GDP growth, while India forecasted seven per cent, while Australia's GDP growth lagged around 3.1 per cent, he said.
"I tend to think earnings will be much higher and that will translate into growth in their [Asian] equity markets," he said.
Investors would have exposure to greater diversification, as in Australia, the top 10 companies accounted for 76 per cent of the index, while in Asia, the top ten firms amounted to 20 per cent of the index.
Also, post-GFC, the Australian index generated 3.2 per cent per annum, while Asia (ex-Japan) yielded 9.1 per cent per annum, he said.
Ho was also excited by China A shares, which allowed Australia investors access to the local Chinese stock market.
The AMP Capital Asian growth fund was buying companies that were benefiting from growing outbound Chinese travel, the growing education market and the growing electric car market, he said.
That growth was not just benefiting China, but the whole Asian region, as more Chinese nationals were also travelling to Korea, for example, to buy make up, have cosmetic surgery and botox.
Recommended for you
Asset managers may be urged to diversify their product ranges, but investment executives have warned any M&A deal should avoid simply filling gaps and instead consider long-term value creation.
Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equity firm.
Fund managers are entering 2025 with the most bullish sentiment since August 2021 and record high allocations to US equities, thanks to the incoming Trump administration.
An independent expert has ruled the Perpetual deal with KKR is no longer in the best interest of shareholders in light of the increased tax liabilities.
