Investors should define infrastructure debt correctly
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b262e/b262e4da300d2719ba766459d8f3c5053a0f707c" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b262e/b262e4da300d2719ba766459d8f3c5053a0f707c" alt="image"
Private infrastructure debt delivers better risk-adjusted returns than corporate debt only when it is narrowly and correctly defined, according to the analysis by the EDHEC Infrastructure Institute private debt index.
According to its study, the senior project finance debt had a consistently higher risk-adjusted performance (sharpe ratio) than both the debt of ‘infrastructure corporates’ and investment grade corporate debt, while the latter two had very similar investment profiles.
EDHECinfra’s director, Frederic Blanc-Brude, said: “Correctly defining infrastructure investment by focusing on financial and economic characteristics rather than industrial sector codes is essential to make this asset class evolve towards maturity.
“These results show that project finance debt is unique but infrastructure corporate debt to much less so.”
The EDHECinfra Private Debt All Infrastructure Europe index was designed to track the performance of hundreds of borrowers and thousands of private debt instruments over the past 20 years.
According to the company, while the broad market private infrastructure debt index out-performed the corporate debt reference over the period, the study showed that most of contribution was driven by project finance debt.
Anne-Christine Champion, champion of Natixix, sponsor of the EDHECinfra chair for the development of the index, said: “These are two different forms of corporate governance, hence the difference of behaviour and credit risk of borrowers.
“Project finance is about creating long-term, resilient financial instruments that are typically not found on corporate balance sheets.”
Recommended for you
Selfwealth has provided an update on the status of its scheme implementation deed with Bell Financial Group as well as whether rival bidder Svava remains in the picture.
Magellan Financial Group has reported its first half FY25 results while appointing a new chief financial officer and promoting Sophia Rahmani to chief executive.
Schroders Australia has launched two active ETFs and plans to further expand its listed range over the year ahead.
Platform Netwealth has reported its financial results for the first half of FY25, reporting an 80 per cent increase in net flows, with its CEO viewing a “huge opportunity” from private assets.