Investors should define infrastructure debt correctly
Private infrastructure debt delivers better risk-adjusted returns than corporate debt only when it is narrowly and correctly defined, according to the analysis by the EDHEC Infrastructure Institute private debt index.
According to its study, the senior project finance debt had a consistently higher risk-adjusted performance (sharpe ratio) than both the debt of ‘infrastructure corporates’ and investment grade corporate debt, while the latter two had very similar investment profiles.
EDHECinfra’s director, Frederic Blanc-Brude, said: “Correctly defining infrastructure investment by focusing on financial and economic characteristics rather than industrial sector codes is essential to make this asset class evolve towards maturity.
“These results show that project finance debt is unique but infrastructure corporate debt to much less so.”
The EDHECinfra Private Debt All Infrastructure Europe index was designed to track the performance of hundreds of borrowers and thousands of private debt instruments over the past 20 years.
According to the company, while the broad market private infrastructure debt index out-performed the corporate debt reference over the period, the study showed that most of contribution was driven by project finance debt.
Anne-Christine Champion, champion of Natixix, sponsor of the EDHECinfra chair for the development of the index, said: “These are two different forms of corporate governance, hence the difference of behaviour and credit risk of borrowers.
“Project finance is about creating long-term, resilient financial instruments that are typically not found on corporate balance sheets.”
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Grant Hackett has been promoted from CEO of Generation Life to head up the wider Generation Development Group.
Tribeca Investment Partners has made a distribution hire from Australian Ethical in a newly-created role focused on the national intermediary market.
Asset managers may be urged to diversify their product ranges, but investment executives have warned any M&A deal should avoid simply filling gaps and instead consider long-term value creation.
Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equity firm.
