International investors aim to crack China’s market
The recentl regulatory approval for BlackRock’s onshore Chinese investment management firm has represented a milestone in a growing competition between international asset managers who are getting closer to cracking the Chinese market as it followed JPMorgan’s earlier acquisition of China International Fund Management (CIFM), according to Fitch Ratings.
Following this, other international managers – such as Fidelity and Neuberger Berman - were still in the licence approval process, while there were reports that Vanguard was planning to move its staff to Shanghai from Hong Kong suggesting the importance that international managers were placing on China, according to a rating agency.
Fitch said that international investment managers had been active in China for some time, although their access to the Chinese market was limited to joint ventures or private fund management licences but BlackRock's regulatory approval from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for its wholly-ownedmutual fund business in China and J.P. Morgan's reported completion of its acquisition of CIFM would enable both managers to enter the Chinese investment management market in full.
However, succeeding in China would be challenging for international investment managers in light of the differences in practices - notably in terms of distribution - between China and other markets, with fund distribution in China typically involving distribution platforms and/or other intermediaries, which could create a conflict with international managers more accustomed to direct distribution to end-investors.
Additionally, a major driver of the growth of money market funds in China and the largest fund type by a significant margin, was electronic distribution via mobile applications such as WeChat.
“International managers will also face stiff competition from domestic investment managers, which often benefit from greater brand recognition, and broader institutional understanding of markets and cultural dynamics. They are also likely to be more attuned to political and regulatory insights,” the agency said.
“Conversely, international investment managers may be able to offer a wider array of investment products than purely domestic managers due to their global presence, thus attracting investors.
“Those international managers with stronger risk-management processes or deeper investment expertise may also be at an advantage compared with purely domestic managers. Investment expertise will be particularly important - those managers who consistently outperform, be they international or domestic - will be more likely to attract and retain assets.”
Fitch said it believed that market liberalisation and structural underlying factors would drive the growth of China's mutual fund sector.
China's open-end mutual fund assets were CNY15 trillion as of end-June 2020, ranking it the fifth-largest mutual fund domicile worldwide, with a growth in China - 70% over the three years to end-1Q20 - outstripping global mutual fund growth of 12% over the same period.
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Bennelong Funds Management chief executive John Burke has told Money Management that the firm is seeking to invest in boutiques in two specific asset classes as it identifies gaps in its product range.
Responsible investment performance concerns have lessened as the market hits $1.6 trillion in AUM, according to RIAA’s annual report, but greenwashing fears among asset managers are on the rise.
Research by Morningstar has found fixed income funds are bucking a general trend around managed fund fee dispersion with a smaller fee dispersion compared to equity ones.
As investors seek to diversify their portfolios, the naming of bond labels has broadened out to include green, social and impact bonds, according to the annual RIAA report.
