Infrastructure only defensive if focused correctly

funds managment infrastructure investment indices

15 February 2016
| By Nicholas |
image
image
expand image

Investors looking to infrastructure funds as a defensive asset allocation, need to be aware of the "purity" of the investments they are considering, a fund manager warns.

Maple-Brown Abbott head of global listed infrastructure, Andrew Maple-Brown, said many infrastructure indices included companies that were not purely infrastructure, and the lack of purity was reflected in the index's performance.

Research by the fund manager found that infrastructure indices with fewer non-core infrastructure businesses listed on them offered better defensive performance than less pure indices.

The manager's research showed that between 31 December 2007 and 11 March 2009, the MSCI World index dropped 49 per cent, while the FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index, declined by 34.9 per cent.

Further analysis of the infrastructure indices in 2015, found that the Standard and Poor's (S&P) Global Infrastructure Index was the least pure, and the poorest performer, Maple-Brown said.

"There's a very strong correlation [between the purity of the indices and their defensive performance], so the purer the index the more defensive the characteristics of that index are," he said.

"A substantial holding in the S&P Global Infrastructure Index is listed as an airport.

"Airports include Singapore Airport Terminal (SAT). SAT sounds like an airport, so it's clearly been put in the GIC [global industry classification standards] classification for airports — now we think of airports [assets] as the owners of the airports, so Sydney Airport or Auckland Airport, SAT doesn't own Changi Airport.

"SAT provides the catering to Changi Airport — SAT also owns pig farms in China, it's not an infrastructure asset."

Maple-Brown added that for infrastructure investment to deliver on the promise of being a defensive investment, attention needed to be placed on insuring assets reflect the core characteristics of infrastructure assets.

"In order to be viewed as a separate asset class, you need to remain focused on only those assets with the strongest infrastructure characteristics," he said.

"We believe where it will not deliver on its promise, is if assets are included in the definition, which do not exhibit the infrastructure characteristics… and primarily that's by broadening the definition too wide."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

2 months ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS