How are markets compared to the 2016 election?
With just one week to go until the US election, global markets have seen far better returns than in the six months turning up to the 2016 election, despite the COVID-19 pandemic.
In 2016, the election was held between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump on 8 November. In the six months leading up to the election to 1 November, the S&P 500 had returned just 2.9% and the Dow Jones had returned 2.4%. Globally, the MSCI ACWI index had returned 2.5% and the ASX 200 had returned 2.9%.
Performance of major markets in six months to 1 November 2016
In contrast, with a week to go until this year’s election between President Trump and Democratic nominee Joe Biden, returns have been far stronger. This was despite the market suffering severe falls earlier in the year as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic which caused a market downturn and high growth in unemployment. The unemployment rate in the US had risen from 3.5% in February to 14.7% in April but had steadily fallen again to 7.9%, although this remained above the long-term average.
US markets had been particularly helped by the performance of the FAANG technology stocks which had driven the market higher.
The S&P 500 had returned 4.2% and the Dow Jones had returned 5.9% while the ASX 200 had been the strongest market with returns of 7.7%. The MSCI ACWI returned 5.3%.
Performance of major markets in six months to 27 October 2020
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
The alternative investment manager has signalled its intentions to repackage an existing fund into a second private equity vehicle, targeting both listed and unlisted opportunities.
The acquisition of Mason Stevens by Adamantem Capital has reached completion, as the wealth platform looks to increase investment into its services for Australian wealth practices.
Platinum Asset Management and VanEck have both announced name changes to multiple of their ETFs to clarify their complexity.
Active ETFs are gaining traction in Asia-Pacific as wealth managers seek to blend the low-cost fees of passive with active management.
