Hedge fund definition presents a catch-all concern
The recently announced industry standard for defining a hedge fund presents a catch-all concern to unaware fund managers.
With the release of Regulatory Guide 240 'Hedge funds: improving disclosure', some fund managers may be shocked to find they are, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's (ASIC's) definition, operating as a hedge fund, Zenith Investment Partners head of alternatives research Daniel Liptak said.
Some infrastructure, property, real estate and agricultural managed funds currently meet at least two of the five criteria that constitute a hedge fund, which includes any managed fund that uses leverage, derivatives and short-selling.
According to Liptak, funds that are flagged by ASIC may be treated differently by platforms.
"For investors there's two possible outcomes - they'll either run a mile or they'll say, 'well we've been in a hedge fund all this time and nothing has gone wrong', so it (the definition) could be a positive," he said.
The disclosure requirements themselves could also be a positive outcome for domestic operators because most will be able to meet the principles - albeit with minor changes to their existing systems - while offshore funds with large institutional clients may struggle.
Recommended for you
The merger with L1 Capital will “inject new life” into Platinum, Morningstar believes, but is unlikely to boost Platinum’s declining funds under management.
More than half of the top 20 most popular shares bought by advised investors during the first half of 2025 were ETFs, according to AUSIEX data.
At least two-thirds of ETF flows are understood to be driven by intermediaries, according to Global X, as net flows into Australian ETFs spike 97 per cent in the first half of 2025.
Inflows for the first half of 2025 for GQG Partners stand at US$8 billion, but the firm has flagged fund underperformance could be a headwind for future flows.
