Healthcare funds see performance divergence


While healthcare has been one of the stand-out sectors since the start of the year, it has been important for investors to consider fund selection as there has been divergent performance between the individual funds.
Earlier this month, healthcare was named as the sector most likely to outperform in 2021 with 73% expecting stocks in that sectors to increase in value.
Using FE Analytics, there were four healthcare funds in the Australian Core Strategies universe; ETFS S&P Biotech, Platinum International Health Care, CFS Wholesale Global Health and Biotechnology and BetaShares Global Healthcare ETF Currency Hedged.
ETFS S&P Biotech returned 31.6% over one year to 30 October, 2020, while Platinum International Health Care returned 24.9%.
The ETFS fund aimed to provide investors with exposure to US biotechnology companies which were engaged in research and development of products based on genetic analysis and genetic engineering. With 124 equally-weighted holdings, ETFS said this reduced single-stock risk especially as biotechnology was a risky sector.
However, there were fewer returns for CFS Wholesale Global Health and Biotechnology and BetaShares Global Healthcare ETF Currency Hedged which had returned 10.1% and 2.3%.
The difference was even more pronounced since the start of the year with the ETFS and Platinum funds seeing double-digit returns while the BetaShares fund reported losses of 4.5%. The CFS fund saw returns since the start of the year of 2.8%.
Recommended for you
The alternative investment manager has signalled its intentions to repackage an existing fund into a second private equity vehicle, targeting both listed and unlisted opportunities.
The acquisition of Mason Stevens by Adamantem Capital has reached completion, as the wealth platform looks to increase investment into its services for Australian wealth practices.
Platinum Asset Management and VanEck have both announced name changes to multiple of their ETFs to clarify their complexity.
Active ETFs are gaining traction in Asia-Pacific as wealth managers seek to blend the low-cost fees of passive with active management.