Govt launches consultation on climate reporting framework
The Government is releasing a consultation paper on the development of an Australian climate risk disclosure framework.
In a statement today, Treasurer Jim Chalmers, said the internationally-aligned framework would ensure large business and financial institutions were providing more information and greater transparency on how they were responding to climate change and supporting the transition to net zero.
These reporting requirements were expected to be mandatory for large entities.
It would also provide businesses and investors with the clarity and certainty to manage climate risks and invest in new opportunities.
He said: “As more countries move towards global best practice, and as investors demand higher-quality disclosures, it’s important that Australia now establish a framework for consistent, credible, internationally-comparable disclosures."
The Government will consult closely with industry, financial regulators and other stakeholders to develop an approach that was fit for purpose.
Consultation was open and submissions would close on 17 February 2023.
Secondly, Treasury was tasked with developing a comprehensive sustainable finance strategy, encompassing a range of measures to improve transparency, deepen Australia’s green finance markets, and seize opportunities presented by surging global momentum in sustainable finance.
The strategy would include the development of new standards or taxonomies for sustainable investment, further initiatives to reduce greenwashing and strengthen ESG labelling, and more ambitious participation in global forums to support climate and sustainable finance frameworks and investment.
It would be developed in close co-ordination with ASIC, APRA, the RBA, Treasury and other Commonwealth departments and industry, and would be considered by Government in early 2023 before a period of public consultation on key measures.
Chalmers said: “With these commitments in place, financial markets are much better placed to make the long-term investments needed to meet these targets.
“Our intention is to provide a strong foundation for clear, comparable and credible climate-related financial reporting by Australian entities that improves transparency for customers and investors and aligns with global practice.
“The Albanese Government is not wasting a day in responding to the challenge of climate change and maximising the economic opportunities from investing in cleaner, cheaper and more reliable energy.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Tribeca Investment Partners has made a distribution hire from Australian Ethical in a newly-created role focused on the national intermediary market.
Asset managers may be urged to diversify their product ranges, but investment executives have warned any M&A deal should avoid simply filling gaps and instead consider long-term value creation.
Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equity firm.
Fund managers are entering 2025 with the most bullish sentiment since August 2021 and record high allocations to US equities, thanks to the incoming Trump administration.
How do I address the risk that it is just the Sun?
An absolute waste of time and money
An absolute waste of time and money
This is a very good initiative to benefit investors. There's no point in investing in companies with stranded assets.
Governments and associated Agency Bureaucrats making predictions on stranded assets? Since when did this collective of minds become so smart? What could possibly go wrong?
Superannuation funds, investment houses and others in banking and financial services are already making the decisions on assets likely to be stranded. Good financial advisors are also acknowledging the issue of stranded assets. Maybe stranded assets should be added to the qualifications necessary to become a financial advisor to weed out those that are not interested in clients' best long term interests.
"Maybe stranded assets should be added to the qualifications necessary to become a financial advisor to weed out those that are not interested in clients' best long term interests." And there it is - the bureaucrats know best - if the Financial Planners don't agree, then send them to another communist reeducation camp - get them thinking the right way?
You sure you are not from Treasury? Similar though process to yours it seems.
Hedware, 101 for investing is avoiding companies that are likely to go broke. Sounds like the education you have in mind is more a method to correct people's thinking to be more like yours. It never ends well.