Govt launches consultation on climate reporting framework
The Government is releasing a consultation paper on the development of an Australian climate risk disclosure framework.
In a statement today, Treasurer Jim Chalmers, said the internationally-aligned framework would ensure large business and financial institutions were providing more information and greater transparency on how they were responding to climate change and supporting the transition to net zero.
These reporting requirements were expected to be mandatory for large entities.
It would also provide businesses and investors with the clarity and certainty to manage climate risks and invest in new opportunities.
He said: “As more countries move towards global best practice, and as investors demand higher-quality disclosures, it’s important that Australia now establish a framework for consistent, credible, internationally-comparable disclosures."
The Government will consult closely with industry, financial regulators and other stakeholders to develop an approach that was fit for purpose.
Consultation was open and submissions would close on 17 February 2023.
Secondly, Treasury was tasked with developing a comprehensive sustainable finance strategy, encompassing a range of measures to improve transparency, deepen Australia’s green finance markets, and seize opportunities presented by surging global momentum in sustainable finance.
The strategy would include the development of new standards or taxonomies for sustainable investment, further initiatives to reduce greenwashing and strengthen ESG labelling, and more ambitious participation in global forums to support climate and sustainable finance frameworks and investment.
It would be developed in close co-ordination with ASIC, APRA, the RBA, Treasury and other Commonwealth departments and industry, and would be considered by Government in early 2023 before a period of public consultation on key measures.
Chalmers said: “With these commitments in place, financial markets are much better placed to make the long-term investments needed to meet these targets.
“Our intention is to provide a strong foundation for clear, comparable and credible climate-related financial reporting by Australian entities that improves transparency for customers and investors and aligns with global practice.
“The Albanese Government is not wasting a day in responding to the challenge of climate change and maximising the economic opportunities from investing in cleaner, cheaper and more reliable energy.”
AUTHOR
Laura Dew
Recommended for you
Clime Investment Management has welcomed an independent director to its board, which follows a series of recent appointments at the company.
Ethical investment manager Australian Ethical has cited the ongoing challenging market environment for its modest decrease in assets over the latest quarter.
Commentators have said Australian fund managers are less knowledgeable compared with overseas peers when it comes to expanding their range with ETFs and underestimating the competition from passive strategies.
VanEck is to list two ETFs on the ASX next week, one investing in residential mortgage-backed securities and the other in Indian companies.
How do I address the risk that it is just the Sun?
An absolute waste of time and money
An absolute waste of time and money
This is a very good initiative to benefit investors. There's no point in investing in companies with stranded assets.
Governments and associated Agency Bureaucrats making predictions on stranded assets? Since when did this collective of minds become so smart? What could possibly go wrong?
Superannuation funds, investment houses and others in banking and financial services are already making the decisions on assets likely to be stranded. Good financial advisors are also acknowledging the issue of stranded assets. Maybe stranded assets should be added to the qualifications necessary to become a financial advisor to weed out those that are not interested in clients' best long term interests.
"Maybe stranded assets should be added to the qualifications necessary to become a financial advisor to weed out those that are not interested in clients' best long term interests." And there it is - the bureaucrats know best - if the Financial Planners don't agree, then send them to another communist reeducation camp - get them thinking the right way?
You sure you are not from Treasury? Similar though process to yours it seems.
Hedware, 101 for investing is avoiding companies that are likely to go broke. Sounds like the education you have in mind is more a method to correct people's thinking to be more like yours. It never ends well.