Fund manager thinking is flawed, says Perpetual

asset allocation australian equities fund manager fund managers

29 February 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The failure of the investment industry to deliver what investors needed over the last decade is down to a focus on stock selection at the expense of asset allocation, according to Perpetual.

Perpetual group executive for income and multi sector, Richard Brandweiner, said that asset allocation is about twice as important as stock selection when it comes to investment outcomes.

However, the typical superannuation fund or multi-manager has only one person or group devoted to asset allocation, and 40, 50 or even 80 individual managers looking at stock selection.

With returns of CPI+ 4 per cent easy to achieve in the 1990s, fund managers lost sight of asset allocation as "an important driver of returns", Brandweiner said.

"We've got it the wrong way around," he said.

Another problem with the industry is that incentives and objectives are not properly aligned, Brandweiner said.

"An individual fund manager - who is so important for the outcome for a member at the end of the day - has a different objective to the member. Individual super members need a real return, they need to grow their wealth and have a secure income in retirement," he said.

But an individual fund manager just has to beat the benchmark - and that informs thinking and leads to a flawed structure, he said.

Risk concentration is another big problem with the investment industry, Brandweiner said.

"A typical default fund has 95 per cent of its risk coming out of equities, 55 per cent of that coming from Australian equities. The top five contributors to risk in the ASX200 make up almost 42 per cent of the equity market volatility in a typical balanced fund.

"That means that almost a quarter of the risk in a balanced diversified portfolio comes from two stocks: BHP and the four banks (which is effectively one stock, because they're totally correlated)," Brandweiner said.

Finally, peer risk is an issue when it comes to asset allocation. Funds have a tendency to look around the industry and adopt similar settings, Brandweiner said - with the typical 70/30 equities/bond split being a good example.

"If you look at most asset allocations they're very similar. In fact I know of organisations that actually set their strategic asset allocations based on an average of everybody else. This is what invariably leads to sub-optimal outcomes," Brandweiner said. 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

3 days 12 hours ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

1 week ago

It’s astonishing to see the FAAA now pushing for more advisers by courting "career changers" and international recruits,...

3 weeks 5 days ago

Insignia Financial has made four appointments, including three who have joined from TAL, to lead strategy and innovation in its retirement solutions for the MLC brand....

3 weeks ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been charged with 26 counts of dishonest conduct regarding a failure to disclose he would receive substantial commission payments ...

6 days 16 hours ago

Pinnacle Investment Management has announced it will acquire strategic interests in two international fund managers for $142 million....

5 days 19 hours ago