Fund manager fees ‘licence to print to money’

fund managers superannuation funds superannuation trustees fund manager chief executive AIST

8 September 2010
| By Mike Taylor |

Fund managers are going to be facing downward pressure on the fees they charge superannuation funds, following new research suggesting super fund members are failing to get good value from existing arrangements.

The research, undertaken by Rice Warner Actuaries and released at an Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) conference on the Gold Coast has recommended that superannuation funds use their bargaining muscle to move away from the existing asset-based regime, which generates fees regardless of performance.

The research was released by AIST chief executive, Fiona Reynolds but not before a question and answer session at the conference saw the chief executive of Alliance Bernstein, Michael Bargholz defend the existing arrangements as “suitable for consenting adults”.

Reynolds said the industry needed a fee model that “does more than reward fund managers for managing an ever-expanding pool of assets, even when they have not contributed to that growth.”

She said that in circumstances where Australia boasted a compulsory system of superannuation, the existing funds management fee arrangements were a virtual “licence to print money”.

“The key issue is net returns to members,” Reynolds said, “Clearly, it’s a better outcome for members if they can pay fund managers less but still get the same return for the same risk profile.”

“If we are serious about reducing costs across the super sector, we can’t ignore investment fees,” she said. “Whilst we recognise that we still need to pay for talented and skilful fund managers, our key role is to act in the best interest of members. This in not about being cheap and nasty, it’s about paying fund managers for the value they deliver.”

The Rice Warner study, which primarily focused on listed Australian equities, recommended that super funds move to a fixed dollar fee plus risk-adjusted performance fee model when negotiating fees with active managers of listed equities.

The study recommended a flat fixed dollar fee structure for management of index portfolios.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

4 weeks 1 day ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

4 weeks 2 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks 2 days ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

4 weeks ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

3 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS