Fund manager fees a bit rich

ETFs stock market fund manager retail investors investment management mercer

25 January 2008
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

Harry Liem

Fund management fees are altogether too high and in most cases should not exceed 0.75 per cent, according to one of Australia’s oldest financial services providers.

The senior partner at investment management and stock broking firm Joseph Palmer & Sons, Malcolm Palmer, said while developments in technology mean transaction costs have fallen, this hasn’t translated into a lowering in management fees.

“Funds management fees are too high right across the industry, full stop. This includes performance fees and straight management fees. Charging 1.5, 1.75 or even 1 per cent is just too high for what funds are providing,” he said.

“Given that transaction costs have gone down and, therefore, the costs of running a fund on behalf of an investor have fallen, the management fees have not.”

According to Palmer, while there may still be funds out there with reasonable fees, generally speaking, retail products remain expensive.

“Even a small portfolio of a few hundred thousand shouldn’t be charged more than 0.75 per cent as a management fee.”

While Palmer does acknowledge that fees are trending down, he believes they could be going down a lot faster.

“I’d probably compare it to stockbroking fees in the past. It was only after the deregulation of fees that set off the process of competition that fees just progressively came down and down. I think the same sort of thing should and is going to happen in funds management.”

Palmer said a significant shake out in the stock market, much like the one we’re experiencing now, should also act as a catalyst to increase competition and put pressure on fees.

“The bottom line is that it’s important to get this message out there so that in the end it becomes more economic for investors.”

Mercer senior associate Harry Liem said while smaller investors usually face higher fees, this doesn’t necessarily have to be the case.

“The market is offering room for everybody (eg, even for small passive investors), there are true index, ETFs [exchange traded funds] and index funds. Similarly, for savvy retail investors, they can do their own direct investment and use the Internet for execution … In that sense, the market is already offering ‘you get what you pay for’ in terms of solutions,” Liem said.

“If you don’t think a manager can consistently deliver, invest in a passive fund. For some of the more efficient asset classes (eg, US large caps) this is not a bad idea.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

GG

So shareholders lose a dividend plus have seen the erosion of value. Qantas decides to clawback remuneration from Alan ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
Denise Baker

This is why I left my last position. There was no interest in giving the client quality time, it was all about bumping ...

3 weeks 6 days ago
gonski

So the Hayne Royal Commission has left us with this. What a sad day for the financial planning industry. Clearly most ...

4 weeks ago

The decision whether to proceed with a $100 million settlement for members of the buyer of last resort class action against AMP has been decided in the Federal Court....

1 week 5 days ago

A former Brisbane financial adviser has been found guilty of 28 counts of fraud where his clients lost $5.9 million....

3 weeks 5 days ago

The Financial Advice Association Australia has addressed “pretty disturbing” instances where its financial adviser members have allegedly experienced “bullying” by produc...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS