ESG presents challenge for Asia-Pacific investments

Bell Japan ESG

16 July 2021
| By Laura Dew |
image
image
expand image

Bell Asset Management has highlighted how difficult it can be to find a company in Asia-Pacific that meets its environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards.

The firm ran a Global Emerging Companies fund but it had just 1.7% allocated to the Asia-Pacific region compared to 29% in Europe and 63.7% in the United States.

It held no companies in Japan, which represented a 10.5% underweight, although this had actually benefitted the fund recently due to Japan’s poor performance. The average ESG rating of Japanese companies was BBB which below the MSCI World Index rating of A.

In a webinar, Ned Bell, chief investment officer, said: “We don’t have much exposure in Asia Pacific, there is not much of the right quality for us. Lots of the companies we see in that region are way behind in ESG.

“They have got better, Europe is the gold standard and US companies are catching up but in Japan especially, they are not great, there is still a way to go for ESG of companies in the smaller universe.”

According to McKinsey, smaller companies in Japan “lag behind” on all three elements of ESG. To improve, the organisation said, they needed to focus on their energy consumption and decarbonisation, on gender diversity and societal impact and lastly, on corporate governance and cross-holdings.

Speaking to Money Management, Bell added: “The ESG disclosure levels of Japanese companies are lacking, there is only a handful of AAA-rated Japanese companies which is somewhat disappointing. As far as emerging Asia is concerned, there are many more problematic companies with controversies that cover a range of ESG issues and governance more generally has been somewhat problematic.

“Companies need to be much more proactive about engaging with investors and research houses on ESG. We would also like to see more comprehensive sustainability reports and a willingness to align themselves with the UN Sustainable Development Goals.”

The Bell Global Emerging Companies fund had returned 29.7% over one year to 30 June, according to FE Analytics, versus returns of 41.2% by30 the sector.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

1 month 3 weeks ago

This verdict highlights something deeply wrong and rotten at the heart of the FSCP. We are witnessing a heavy-handed, op...

1 month 4 weeks ago

Interesting. Would be good to know the details of the StrategyOne deal....

2 months ago

SuperRatings has shared the median estimated return for balanced superannuation funds for the calendar year 2024, finding the year achieved “strong and consistent positiv...

2 weeks 2 days ago

Original bidder Bain Capital, which saw its first offer rejected in December, has returned with a revised bid for Insignia Financial....

1 week 2 days ago

The FAAA has secured CSLR-related documents under the FOI process, after an extended four-month wait, which show little analysis was done on how the scheme’s cost would a...

1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS