Equities get easy run compared with structured products
Structured products such as derivatives have yet to recover from recent market impacts with the sector having been reduced from $4 billion to $1 billion in recent years despite being better scrutinised than equities.
Instreet managing director George Lucas said that equities were often not examined closely enough before investing compared with structured products and this had led to an inbalance towards equities investing.
“Few people can explain why some of Australia’s major resource stocks have falling prices in a commodity boom but structured products, which are scrutinised more must explain what they do and why they are doing it,” Lucas said.
“In fact structured products typically perform exactly as the product disclosure statements (PDS) state they will, whereas people seem to be far more forgiving of the losses they sustain when investing in equities, despite not always being able to explain the underlying issues behind the losses.”
Lucas also said there was unfamiliarity around derivatives in the retail financial services market and possibly even some confusion with other structured products such as collaterised debt obligations (CDO).
However he said financial planners should have some awareness of derivatives as they were available to retail investors, typically through self-managed superannuation funds, and offered set outcomes to investors according to the nature of the derivative product.
Recommended for you
The merger with L1 Capital will “inject new life” into Platinum, Morningstar believes, but is unlikely to boost Platinum’s declining funds under management.
More than half of the top 20 most popular shares bought by advised investors during the first half of 2025 were ETFs, according to AUSIEX data.
At least two-thirds of ETF flows are understood to be driven by intermediaries, according to Global X, as net flows into Australian ETFs spike 97 per cent in the first half of 2025.
Inflows for the first half of 2025 for GQG Partners stand at US$8 billion, but the firm has flagged fund underperformance could be a headwind for future flows.
