Emulation funds fail to prove short-term benefit
Despite the promise of lower costs, emulation funds have little benefit over their more liquid counterparts in the short term, research shows.
The specialised funds are designed to reduce trading activity and as a result, lower costs for fund managers.
But the gain in cost-saving is often offset by the opportunity cost of short-term trading profits, according to the Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre (CMCRC), which tracked the funds over four years.
“One of the biggest pitfalls of emulation is that it fails to exploit the short-lived information value of the original trade signal,” Zhe Chen, CMCRC PhD Candidate from the Macquarie Graduate School of Management said.
“This leads to significant losses that appear to outweigh the benefits of reduced transaction costs.”
However, the research found emulation funds could be more beneficial given a longer lag, with the gains from lower transaction costs more likely to amount to real savings over an extended period of time.
Recommended for you
Asset managers may be urged to diversify their product ranges, but investment executives have warned any M&A deal should avoid simply filling gaps and instead consider long-term value creation.
Specialist wealth platform provider Mason Stevens has become the latest target of an acquisition as it enters a binding agreement with a leading Sydney-based private equity firm.
Fund managers are entering 2025 with the most bullish sentiment since August 2021 and record high allocations to US equities, thanks to the incoming Trump administration.
An independent expert has ruled the Perpetual deal with KKR is no longer in the best interest of shareholders in light of the increased tax liabilities.
