Embrace blocs instead of BRICS
Emerging market investors should steer towards country blocs that perform similarly as the macro environment develops rather than sticking to the "flawed" BRICS concept, a global strategist opined.
Investect Asset Management global strategist Dr Michael Power said by clubbing countries with similar economic traits, investors could get a better feel of how markets react to the movement of the "two tides", and prepare themselves against volatility.
The two tides are liquidity, governed by the ‘American moon' and commodities, ruled by the ‘Chinese moon'.
"There are four main blocs within the emerging markets asset class, and they are not a matter of geography," Power said.
"It's more useful to firstly distinguish between whether a country tends to run a current account deficit or surplus, and secondly whether it is primarily a commodity or manufactured goods exporter."
Power placed Australia, Canada, and New Zealand in the north-west, and said the western bloc countries have ties with global liquidity, while the northern bloc is tied to the commodity cycle.
"For instance, 2011 saw the high tide for commodities coincide with strong liquidity flows from quantitative easing. This was ideal for the north-west bloc, with both the Brazilian real and Australian dollar reaching their peak values," he said.
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
The merger with L1 Capital will “inject new life” into Platinum, Morningstar believes, but is unlikely to boost Platinum’s declining funds under management.
More than half of the top 20 most popular shares bought by advised investors during the first half of 2025 were ETFs, according to AUSIEX data.
At least two-thirds of ETF flows are understood to be driven by intermediaries, according to Global X, as net flows into Australian ETFs spike 97 per cent in the first half of 2025.
Inflows for the first half of 2025 for GQG Partners stand at US$8 billion, but the firm has flagged fund underperformance could be a headwind for future flows.
