Don't just take a manager's word on ESG: panel
Greenwashing arose from ‘woeful’ disclosure and investors need to look under the bonnet and not just take the word of the product or fund manager about their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) work, according to a panel.
Speaking at the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) Superannuation Investment Week virtual conference, Aware Super head of responsible investments, Liza McDonald, said her advice to trustees and investors was to do their due diligence.
“Lift the bonnet and don’t just take the word of the product or manager that are telling you they’re doing it. If funds report to say they are contributing to SDGs [UN Sustainable Development Goals] but can’t give you reporting or metrics of they say they are solving then that’s a huge red flag,” she said.
Also on the panel, DWS (US) global head systematic investment solutions, Fiona Bassett, said greenwashing was a huge problem that rose from woeful levels of disclosure but that there were a number of disclosure initiatives, especially in the EU, that were a huge step forward.
“One of the things to look at is the KPIs – it’s something we are focused on to measure our own progress with third party auditors,” she said.
“And if you want to understand who is greenwashing and who is not you should look at a fund’s stewardship. Go look at their proxy voting records because this will tell you everything.”
Bassett said DWS also used multiple sources of data sets to help cross reference and validate the ESG data they were looking at.
“If you had 100 of my peers in a room, the majority would be using only one data source,” she said.
After using multiple data sets, Bassett said her firm would then rank companies based on whether people were leaders or laggards and would integrate ESG into the portfolio around those metrics.
Recommended for you
With BlackRock recently combining both private and public markets in a single managed account for US investors, commentators explore the challenges and opportunities of doing so in Australia.
PM Capital has hit out at Platinum Asset Management, saying the firm only provided “limited engagement” following its bid for two listed investment companies.
Platinum Asset Management has seen outflows moderate during March, down 15 per cent from the previous month when it announced two major investment team changes.
Two listing experts have shared tips for fund managers to consider when it comes to launching their first ETF on an exchange.
