Capture spread key to retirement outcomes

fidelity retirement outcomes retirement income risk

8 November 2019
| By Jassmyn |
image
image
expand image

Understanding capture spread will allow advisers and investors to deliver better outcomes in retirement, according to Fidelity.

Fidelity International head of client solutions and retirement, Richard Dinham, said while taking some risk in retirement was needed to avoid unpalatable outcomes, limiting downward movements in retirement portfolios was even more important than capturing the full upside in markets.

“You can’t spirit away market risk but you can sensibly manage it,” he said.

“Retirees still need to take appropriate investment risk to address inflation and longevity risk, but there also needs to be a focus on the impact of market volatility on retirement outcomes, known as sequencing risk.

“While the positive impacts of compounding and dollar cost averaging are well understood when it comes to saving, many people are not aware that the opposite is true during decumulation. In fact, limiting losses in retirement has a more powerful effect on long term growth than capturing the full upside of market gains.”

Dinham said the compounding effect of investment losses – downside capture – could have a devastating effect on retirement portfolios.

“Accordingly, the right kind of equity risk in retirement should come with excellent downside capture to protect in down markets and a capture spread that enables sufficient participation in the market upswings. This approach has been shown to deliver better outcomes in retirement,” he said.

He said less downside capture hugely improved compounded returns, gave portfolios a smoother ride, and protections from the worst of equities markets.

Dinham pointed to examples of what positive returns were required to break-even after market losses. He said a portfolio that lost 10% would need to capture 11% of the upside to break-even. However, a fund that lost 40% would need to return 67% to break-even, and a fund that lost 50% would need to return 100% to break-even.

“When people are saving for retirement, the focus tends to be solely on performance.  While that may be appropriate during the accumulation phase, it fails to address the complex needs of those people approaching retirement or in retirement,” Dinham said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 weeks 5 days ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

3 weeks 2 days ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

2 months 3 weeks ago

AMP is to launch a digital advice service to provide retirement advice to members of its AMP Super Fund, in partnership with Bravura Solutions. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has taken action against a Queensland adviser who was sentenced last May for misappropriating $1.8 million from his clients....

2 weeks 1 day ago

A former Insignia Financial C-suite exec has taken on a leadership role at MUFG Retirement Solutions as it announces chief executive Dee McGrath will depart after six yea...

2 weeks 2 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS