Bushfires impact stock and sector exposures
Stocks with exposure to retail, insurance, food and beverage and transport would be likely to feel the largest negative effects, while resources, building materials and infrastructure sectors were expected to be only mildly affected, the analysts said.
Further to that, the implications of bushfires could drag on gross domestic product (GDP) by 0.25% per quarter in Q4 2019 and Q1 2020, with agriculture, retail, tourism and construction taking the highest toll.
However, the expected budget surplus of $5 billion was not likely at risk, as according to UBS’ analysts, due to a three-year $2 billion relief package over, of which $500 million to be spent this financial year, as promised by the federal government.
Also, on the positive note, S&P confirmed it was highly unlikely for the agency to downgrade Australia’s credit rating from bushfire-related spending.
However, the bushfires increased the likelihood of another rate cut from the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) in February, the analysts said.
“Moreover, the RBA noted in the December minutes they would ‘reassess the economic outlook in February 2020’ and ‘had the ability to provide further stimulus to the economy, if required’,” UBS said in its sector review report.
“We continue to expect the RBA to cut by 25bps in February, ahead of downgrading the economic outlook in the February SOMP [statement on monetary policy].”
AUTHOR
Oksana Patron
Recommended for you
Outflows from an Australian private markets fund manager have caused FUM at Pacific Current to decline by $1 billion in the last quarter.
Former RIAA chief executive Simon O’Connor has joined the ethical advisory panel at U Ethical Investors.
Financial services leaders are “all cashed up with nowhere to grow” when it comes to M&A activity, according to Deloitte, with 90 per cent saying they have strong balance sheets ready for an acquisition.
As fund managers are urged to diversify their product ranges, they are finding a faster way to do this is via an acquisition of existing firms but experts say it is not without potential culture clashes.
