Beware poor ESG in passive funds
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e156/3e1564fcca033dcb3370bb432cf0d1704267a6a2" alt="image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e156/3e1564fcca033dcb3370bb432cf0d1704267a6a2" alt="image"
Investors in passive emerging markets funds need to be wary of being invested in companies with poor environmental and social governance standards (ESG), according to Stewart Investors manager Jack Nelson.
Opting for an index or exchange traded fund (ETF) meant investors followed the benchmark which could typically contain large multi-nationals which did not always adhere to the best standards.
Nelson, who manages the Stewart Investors Wholesale Global Emerging Markets Sustainability fund, said: “It is difficult to screen for quality companies in a passive fund. Without taking an active approach then you can end up misallocated into bad companies.”
Many of the companies that scored poorly from an ESG perspective were state-owned enterprises, those companies where the state was the majority shareholder, a practice that was particularly big in countries such as Brazil, China and South Africa.
This state ownership then led to a misalignment between the strategic interest of the state and those of minority shareholders. However, they generally tended to have lower risk than the wider market as they were backed by the government and had higher dividend yields.
Nelson said financial and resources companies were also sectors which tended to score poorly on ESG standards.
Emerging market companies tended to score lower overall than their developed market counterparts on factors such as board, ownership and control and pay and accounting practices.
This was worsened, Nelson said, by the fact there was often limited corporate transparency or disclosure at emerging market companies which made them harder for managers to assess.
“There have been issues of corruption, the interactions between management and politicians can undo businesses and we have seen that repeatedly over the years. Also resources companies have had environmental disasters which make us wary,” he said.
“We are trying to find high quality companies run by people we can trust, which are resilient to change and financed in a conservative way.”
The Stewart Investors Wholesale Global Emerging Markets Sustainability fund has returned 9.1 per cent over one year to 19 August, according to FE Analytics, versus returns of 6.4 per cent by the ACS Equity-Emerging Markets sector.
Recommended for you
Australian Ethical has become the latest fund manager to flag an expansion of its private markets range while reporting a 50 per cent rise in statutory net profit after tax in the first half of FY25.
PM Capital’s Global Opportunities Fund has made a binding offer to acquire the two listed investment companies run by Platinum Asset Management.
Costs associated with the failed KKR deal have caused Perpetual’s statutory net profit after tax to more than halve to $12 million for the first half of FY25.
The exit of co-CIOs Andrew Clifford and Clay Smolinski from Platinum has highlighted key person risk, with Morningstar raising its outflow forecast to 33 per cent of FUM per annum in response.