Australian funds should embrace mandatory transparency
Australian superannuation funds should not the experience in the US and not be resistant to greater transparency around investment performance and cost, according to Vanguard chairman, Bill McNabb.
Addressing the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA), McNabb noted the attitude to such transparency but said the requirements flowing from the Dodd Frank in the US had ultimately proved to be beneficial.
He said that the US investment industry had originally resisted the transparency requirements with respect to cost and performance but this had proved to be a mistake.
McNabb said that while the requirement had originally be voluntary, it had elicited little support from firms in the US and was not mandatory.
“We fought the idea, but we should not have fought it,” he said.
“Transparency around cost and performance has proved a driver to competition and beneficial change,” McNabb said.
Recommended for you
Bennelong Funds Management chief executive John Burke has told Money Management that the firm is seeking to invest in boutiques in two specific asset classes as it identifies gaps in its product range.
Responsible investment performance concerns have lessened as the market hits $1.6 trillion in AUM, according to RIAA’s annual report, but greenwashing fears among asset managers are on the rise.
Research by Morningstar has found fixed income funds are bucking a general trend around managed fund fee dispersion with a smaller fee dispersion compared to equity ones.
As investors seek to diversify their portfolios, the naming of bond labels has broadened out to include green, social and impact bonds, according to the annual RIAA report.
