ASIC warned on PDS shortcomings
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has been told that rather than seeking to issue new guidance on Product Disclosure Statements (PDSs), the underlying legislation should be changed to ensure consumers received greater clarity around fees and costs.
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has filed a highly pointed submission with ASIC arguing that formal legislative and regulatory effort is needed to address longstanding fee disclosure issues.
"ASFA's strongly preferred approach would be for Treasury to undertake a comprehensive review of the intended policy outcomes and legislative provisions, in place of the on-going, piece-meal approach that ASIC has been forced to adopt in order to address the underlying legislative issues," the submission said.
It said the primary purpose of PDS disclosure was to allow consumers to compare products, including direct fees and indirect costs that they might be exposed to.
"The starting point to achieving consistency and accuracy is for clear requirements in the primary legislation and supporting regulation," the ASFA submission said.
It went on to say that it believed the differences in the fee disclosure requirements for superannuation funds and managed funds were unnecessary, did not appear logical and might prove to be counter-productive.
"Applying separate requirements makes it difficult for consumers to compare these products and for product issuers to manage these disclosure obligations efficiently," the submission said. "It is not clear to ASFA what is the policy objective for the differences. As a result of the differences, disclosure practices will diverge rather than achieve a level of consistency that should be the policy objective."
"ASFA is not is not confident that total investment related fees and costs will be disclosed consistently across the industry as a result of these changes," it said.
Recommended for you
Evidentia’s chief investment strategist Nathan Lim has announced his retirement after a 30-year career.
GQG Partners has marked its fifth consecutive month of outflows as its AI concerns lead to fund underperformance but overall funds under management increased to US$166.1 billion.
Apostle Funds Management is actively pursuing further partnerships in Asia and Europe but finding a suitable manager is a “needle in a haystack”.
Managed account provider Trellia Wealth Partners, formed from the merger between Betashares and InvestSense, has appointed its first managing partner.
